Latest rulings

  • Beautaholics Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)
    • 05 November 2025

    A paid-for Meta ad and a website page for a hair and skincare retailer which featured an LED facemask made medicinal claims for a product that was not registered with the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and didn't have the applicable conformity marking.

  • Cleriva t/a NovaFlow

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 05 November 2025

    Two paid-for Facebook ads for a sinus clearing device made medical claims for a product that did not have the applicable conformity marking and was not registered with the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

  • Invention Works BV t/a Silk’n

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)
    • 05 November 2025

    A paid-for Meta ad and website page for a hair and skincare tool retailer, which featured an LED facemask, made medicinal claims for a product that was not registered with the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and did not have the applicable conformity marking.

  • Project E Beauty LLC

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)
    • 05 November 2025

    A paid-for Meta ad and a website page for a hair and skincare retailer, which featured an LED facemask made medicinal claims for a product that was not registered with the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and did not have the applicable conformity marking.