Latest news
-
Regulating the Illusion of Intelligence in Ads
- CAP News
- 27 August 2026
-
Less healthy foods – an overview of LHF
- CAP News
- 27 August 2026
-
Trust me, I'm a... compliant advertiser
- CAP News
- 13 August 2026
-
The ABC of back-to-school campaigns
- CAP News
- 13 August 2026
-
With Great Advertising Power Comes Great Responsibility…
- CAP News
- 23 July 2026
-
Keep your ads a cut above the rest: Advertising products and services for hair loss
- CAP News
- 09 July 2026
Latest rulings
-
Kind Patches Ltd
- Upheld
- Social media (paid ad)
- 02 September 2026
A paid-for Instagram ad for a supplement company, misleadingly implied their products had health benefits without supporting evidence and irresponsibly trivialised and condoned an act of anti-social behaviour.
-
PLK Chicken UK Ltd t/a Popeyes
- Not upheld
- Social media (paid ad)
- 02 September 2026
An Instagram ad by @onlyscrans and a paid-for Instagram ad for Popeyes didn’t break the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.
-
Ferrero UK Ltd t/a Thorntons
- Not upheld
- Social media (paid ad)
- 19 August 2026
A paid-for Instagram ad for Thorntons didn’t break the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.
-
YO! Sushi UK Ltd t/a YO!
- Upheld
- Social media (paid ad)
- 12 August 2026
A paid-for Instagram post for YO! Sushi broke the rules by featuring an identifiable specific less healthy food product.

