-
Chuckling Goat Ltd
A poster ad and website claims by a food provider broke the rules by implying its products prevented, treated or cured human disease.
-
PCK SKIN (Manchester) Ltd t/a SkinSpaceUK
A promotional email, by an aesthetic clinic, offering vitamin injections broke the rules by promoting prescription-only medicines to the general public.
-
Procter & Gamble (Health & Beauty Care) Ltd
A poster advertising nasal spray made misleading claims about its effectiveness against eliminating cold symptoms.
-
Revival Drinks Ltd t/a Revival Shots
A Facebook ad and two Instagram ads for Revival Shots broke the ad rules by implying that their food product could prevent, treat or cure human disease and for making health claims that were not listed as authorised on the EU Register of nutrition and health claims.
-
STYLIDEAS Ltd
A tweet by Lord Alan Sugar and Stylsmile UK did not make clear it was an ad.
-
Procter & Gamble (Health & Beauty Care) Ltd
A TV ad and website claims for an anti-ageing moisturiser did not mislead about the level of sun protection the product provided
-
Cosmetic Medical Advice UK Ltd t/a Dr Rita Rakus Clinic
Instagram posts that implied an IV drip treatment could help to prevent people from catching coronavirus/COVID-19 broke the advertising rules.
-
REVIV UK Ltd
Claims on a website that an IV drip treatment could prevent or treat coronavirus/COVID-19 broke the advertising rules.
-
The Private Harley Street Clinic
Claims on a website that an IV drip treatment could prevent or treat coronavirus/COVID-19 broke the advertising rules.
-
MW Nutrition Ltd t/a Motion Nutrition
A website ad for nutrition capsules was banned for claiming they could prevent degenerative diseases.
-
Easylife Group Ltd t/a Easylife Group, Positive Health
A brochure ad was banned for making medicinal claims for unlicensed products.
-
Easy Shopping 4 Home Ltd
A product listing on Amazon for face masks claiming to protect consumers from coronavirus was misleading and irresponsible and likely to cause fear without justifiable reason.
-
Novads OU
Paid-for display ads and website claims for face masks claiming to protect consumers from coronavirus were misleading and irresponsible and likely to cause fear without justifiable reason.
-
Atlantic Therapeutics Group Ltd t/a innovo
Two TV ads claiming shorts could strengthen women’s pelvic floor and treat incontinence were misleading.
-
The Green People Company Ltd t/a Green People, Green People Co
A direct mail and a blog post advertising sun cream were banned for being misleading and irresponsible.
-
infirst Healthcare Ltd t/a Flarin
A TV ad for ibuprofen products misleadingly implied that it was superior to other products for treating the joint pain.
-
Friction Free Shaving Ltd
Claims on a website for a razor subscription service were misleading.
-
Cyrano Ltd
A Facebook post for a sunbed retailer misled by inaccurately representing the opinions of the person quoted.
-
Cells4Life Group LLP
Claims on a cord blood stem cell bank website that made comparisons with identifiable competitors were misleading.
-
AK Sports Therapy & Massage t/a AK Sports Therapy & Massage
Posts on Instagram and LinkedIn for sports therapy and massage did not break the rules around misleadingness.
-
CrossReach Trading Ltd
Media: Internet (on own site)
Topic: Medical procedures and services, Children and the vulnerable -
The Back Doctor
Media: Circular
Topic: Health conditions -
The Feel Good Group Ltd
Media: Internet (social networking)
Topic: Health conditions -
Waterman Corporate Enterprises Ltd
Media: Internet (on own site), Internet (e-tailing)
Topic: Beauty products, grooming and hygiene