Rulings (9)
  • In The Style Fashion Ltd t/a In the Style

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site), Social media (own site)
    • 23 March 2022

    Two Instagram Stories and a website ad for an online clothing brand were banned for making misleading price claims.

  • Emma Matratzen GmbH t/a Emma Mattress

    • Upheld
    • Poster, Internet (website content)
    • 16 March 2022

    A website and poster ad for mattresses were banned for making misleading savings claims. 

  • Specsavers Hearcare Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Leaflet
    • 16 February 2022

    A leaflet for Specsavers Hearcare was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence and was not irresponsible.

  • Kiddies Kingdom Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 13 October 2021

    A website ad for children’s clothes and products were banned for making misleading savings claims.

  • Vodafone Ltd t/a Voxi, vodafone

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 13 October 2021

    A website ad for Voxi was banned for making misleading price claims.

  • Alpha Holidays Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 01 September 2021

    We banned an ad for falsely suggesting holidays could be cancelled without charge before specified dates.

  • Galco Enterprises Ltd t/a NationwideBathrooms.com

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 01 September 2021

    We banned ads on Nationwide Bathroom’s website over misleading pricing.

  • Maple Syrup Media Ltd t/a Quidco, Quidco.com

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 18 August 2021

    We banned ads that had promoted different levels of cashback based on logged-in and non-logged-in website visitors.

  • Tesco Stores Ltd t/a Tesco

    • Not upheld
    • Newspaper
    • 09 June 2021

    A newspaper ad for Tesco did not make misleading price comparison claims and did not break the CAP Code.