-
Telefonica UK Ltd t/a O2
Two newspaper ads for O2 made misleading claims about the total cost of an iPad and Surface Pros.
-
Grapevine Europe Ltd
A TV ad for a car buying comparison site misled consumers about what personal information was needed to obtain valuations from their website.
-
Sky UK Ltd
A TV ad misleadingly implied Sky offered the UK’s lowest-priced superfast broadband.
-
Boohoo.com UK Ltd
Discount claims in an email and website misleadingly implied all products would be discounted and a countdown clock on the website misleadingly implied the offers were time-limited.
-
I Saw it First Ltd
A text message and a website for an online fashion retailer misleadingly implied a promotion was applicable to all products and that, by using a countdown clock, discount offers were time-limited.
-
MissPap Ltd t/a Misspap
A website for an online fashion retailer which used a countdown clock misleadingly implied discount offers were time-limited.
-
Buy It Direct Ltd t/a Furniture123
A furniture website made misleading savings claims.
-
Iceland Foods Ltd t/a Iceland
A national press ad for a supermarket did not make a misleading price comparison.
-
Warners Group Publications plc
A Facebook post for a railway magazine promoting a goody bag was banned for failing to disclose that buyers would be tied into a yearly subscription.
-
BrandAlley UK Ltd t/a BrandAlley, Brand alley
A website ad making savings claim on a mattress topper was banned for being misleading.
-
StubHub (UK) Ltd
A poster ad for a third-party reseller that claimed to guarantee genuine tickets would always be sold was misleading.
-
Pepper Deals Ltd
A website promotion for a luggage set was not clearly identifiable as an ad.
-
RSD Travel Ltd
A magazine price comparison ad for a holiday to Cyprus was banned for being misleading.
-
Sunshine Cruise Holidays Ltd
A newspaper ad for cruises was found to not be misleading on pricing.
-
The Hut.com Ltd t/a MyProtein, Lookfantastic
An ad on a website offering discounts for beauty products was banned for being misleading.
-
Objective Concept t/a copyright.co.uk
A company website did not make clear customers would be entering into an annual subscription for its copyright service.
-
Wowcher Ltd t/a Wowcher
A product listing for a “Grey Memory Foam Divan Bed”, seen on www.wowcher.co.uk on 27 March 2019, included a roundel contained the price “FROM £99” above a scored through price of £469.01. Further down the page in the “Full details” section text stated “We’re ...
-
Funeralbooker Ltd t/a Beyond
Claims on a funeral comparison website were misleading.
-
Amazon Europe Core Sarl
An Amazon website ad for Prime was banned for breaking the rules around misleadingness and qualification.
-
appleiphoneunlock.uk
A phone repair website quoted misleading prices.
-
Cameron Mackintosh Ltd - unconfirmed
Media: Internet (on own site)
Topic: Pricing and charges -
Splendor SA
Media: National press
Topic: Clothing, shoes and jewellery, Pricing and charges -
EMP Mail order UK Ltd
Media: Internet (on own site), Internet (display)
Topic: Pricing and charges -
TalkTalk Telecom Ltd
Media: Email
Topic: Promotions and competitions, Pricing and charges -
Tapi Carpets & Floors Ltd
Media: Internet (on own site), Point of sale
Topic: Promotions and competitions, Pricing and charges