Rulings (263)
  • CC Response NW Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid), Website (own site)
    • 29 April 2026

    Two paid-for Google search listings and a web landing page for an accident claims management company failed to make the nature of their service clear, misleadingly implied there was no cost to consumers and made misleading claims in relation to potential savings.

  • Exclusive Law Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid), Website (own site)
    • 29 April 2026

    Three paid-for Google search listings and a website for an accident claims management company failed to make the nature of their service clear, misleadingly implied there was no cost to consumers and irresponsibly discouraged consumers from approaching their insurance provider. They also misleadingly implied that the u...

  • Gismart Ltd t/a Dancebit

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 29 April 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a dance workout app misleadingly stated that their service was free.

  • iRevolution Claims Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid), Website (own site)
    • 29 April 2026

    Three Google search listings and a website for an accident claims management company failed to make the nature of their service clear and misleadingly implied there was no cost to consumers.

  • Birling Shore Ltd t/a ShroomIQ

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)
    • 22 April 2026

    A website and paid-for Facebook ad for a children’s supplement brand stated that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure the symptoms of ADHD, Tourette Syndrome, anxiety and depression. The ads also made medicinal claims for unauthorised products, made unauthorised health claims&nb...

  • Dollead Technology Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 22 April 2026

    A paid-for search ad for a vacuum review website failed to make their commercial intent clear and falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their trade by presenting websites used for marketing purposes as independent review sites.

  • Easy as HGV Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 22 April 2026

    Three websites for Heavy Goods Vehicle (HGV) training service providers made misleading claims about HGV test pass rates and falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their business.

  • Ecoflow Innovation UK

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 22 April 2026

    A website for a sustainable energy company misleadingly claimed that their products could be installed without using a certified installer or electrician.

  • Global Health Tests Ltd t/a Check My Body Health

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 22 April 2026

    A website for a Bioresonance hair test misleadingly claimed that the test could comprehensively analyse body intolerances.

  • HGV Learning

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 22 April 2026

    A website for a Heavy Goods Vehicle (HGV) training service provider made misleading claims about HGV test pass rates.

  • HGVT Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 22 April 2026

    A website and pages for Heavy Goods Vehicle (HGV) training service providers made misleading claims about HGV test pass rates, the nature of a promotion and being the largest and best rated HGV training provider. The ad also falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their business.

  • L'OrĂ©al (UK) Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Video on demand
    • 22 April 2026

    A Video-On-Demand ad for a serum made misleading claims that it was clinically proven to reduce hyperpigmentation in two weeks.

  • Pets Corner UK Ltd t/a Pet Food Expert

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 22 April 2026

    A homepage for a website providing information about pet food falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their trade by misleadingly presenting the website as independent.

  • Sinointeractive Digital Marketing Co Ltd t/a trustedbuyerguide.org

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 22 April 2026

    A paid-for search ad for a vacuum review website failed to make their commercial intent clear and falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their trade by presenting websites used for marketing purposes as independent review sites.

  • Xinyu International Trading Ltd t/a consumertestreports.org

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 22 April 2026

    A paid-for search ad for a vacuum review website failed to make their commercial intent clear and falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their trade by presenting websites used for marketing purposes as independent review sites.

  • GDK International Ltd t/a German Doner Kebab

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 15 April 2026

    An Instagram ad for German Doner Kebab, posted by influencer John Fisher, didn’t break the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy product.

  • Iceland Foods Ltd t/a Iceland and The Food Warehouse

    • Upheld
    • Website (paid ad), Internet (display)
    • 15 April 2026

    A banner ad and a display ad for Iceland Foods broke the rules by featuring identifiable less healthy food products.

  • Lidl Northern Ireland Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 15 April 2026

    An Instagram post for Lidl by influencer Emma Kearney broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.

  • Untamed Cat Food Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 15 April 2026

    An Instagram post on Untamed Cat Food’s account misleadingly made comparative claims with identifiable competitors and made misleading claims relating to the meat content of a cat’s diet and their product or rival brands.

  • Juniper Technologies UK Ltd t/a Juniper

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 08 April 2026

    Posts in weight-loss support groups on Facebook didn't make clear they were paid for by the advertiser and they promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, which is against the law and our rules.