Rulings (61)
  • Harnbury Holdings Ltd t/a San Carlo

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 23 September 2026

    An Instagram post by Pamela Olender for the restaurant San Carlo Cicchetti wasn’t obviously identifiable as an ad and broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product. 

  • Morley's (Fast Foods) Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 23 September 2026

    An Instagram post by Ellie Scotney for Morley’s UK broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product. 

  • The Trade Desk, Inc

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 23 September 2026

    A promoted LinkedIn post from a media buying platform broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food. 

  • Whitworths Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 23 September 2026

    An Instagram post on the WhitworthsUK page made unauthorised health claims and implied that a food could prevent or treat human disease. 

  • McCain Foods (GB) Ltd t/a McCain Foodservice Solutions

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 16 September 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for McCain Foods and Five Akhi’s restaurants broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.

  • Kind Patches Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 02 September 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for a supplement company, misleadingly implied their products had health benefits without supporting evidence and irresponsibly trivialised and condoned an act of anti-social behaviour. 

  • PLK Chicken UK Ltd t/a Popeyes

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 02 September 2026

    An Instagram ad by @onlyscrans and a paid-for Instagram ad for Popeyes didn’t break the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.  

  • Ferrero UK Ltd t/a Thorntons

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 19 August 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for Thorntons didn’t break the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.

  • YO! Sushi UK Ltd t/a YO!

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 12 August 2026

    A paid-for Instagram post for YO! Sushi broke the rules by featuring an identifiable specific less healthy food product.

  • Costcutter Supermarkets Group Ltd t/a Costcutter and Mondelez Europe Services GmbH – UK branch t/a Cadbury (Mondelez)

    • Upheld in part
    • Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)
    • 05 August 2026

    A webpage for Costcutter and Cadburys broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product. Another ad was investigated but it didn’t break our rules.

  • Innate-Essence Ltd t/a the Turmeric Co.

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 05 August 2026

    A website for a turmeric shot company made claims that a food could prevent, treat or cure human disease.

  • Warner Bros Entertainment UK Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Poster, Television
    • 05 August 2026

    A TV ad and two posters for the film They Will Kill You weren’t irresponsible or offensive and didn’t glamourise violence and knife crime. The ads were suitable for display in an untargeted medium, had suitable scheduling restrictions and hasn’t been inappropriately placed during a UEFA Champions Leag...

  • Warner Bros Entertainment UK Ltd

    • Upheld in part
    • Poster, Television
    • 05 August 2026

    Posters for the film Lee Cronin’s The Mummy were likely to cause fear or distress to young children and were unsuitable for outdoor display. Two other ads were investigated but they didn’t break our rules.

  • Bubbleology UK-I Ltd t/a Bubbleology

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 22 July 2026

     A paid-for Instagram ad for a bubble tea company didn’t break the less healthy food rules because it was a small and medium-sized enterprise and was therefore exempt. 

  • Domino's Pizza UK & Ireland Ltd t/a Domino's

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Television, Video on demand
    • 22 July 2026

    A TV ad, Video on Demand ad and a YouTube ad for Domino’s broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product. 

  • Higham Miller Coffee Ltd t/a Exhale Healthy Coffee

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 22 July 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for a coffee company made unauthorised health and nutrition claims and included health claims that referred to the recommendation of an individual health professional.   

  • McDonald's Restaurants Ltd t/a McDonald's

    • Not Upheld
    • Television
    • 22 July 2026

    A TV ad for McDonalds didn’t break the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy product.   

  • Domino's Pizza UK & Ireland Ltd t/a Domino's

    • Not Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 08 July 2026

    Two paid-for social media ads for Domino’s pizza didn’t break the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy product.

  • Kentucky Fried Chicken (Great Britain) Ltd t/a KFC

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Television, Video on demand
    • 08 July 2026

    A TV ad, Video on Demand and three paid-for social media ads for KFC didn’t break the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy product.

  • Mars Wrigley Confectionery UK Ltd t/a Mars

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 08 July 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for M&M’s broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product through the inclusion of a character that depicted a specific less healthy food product.