Rulings (5)
  • The Professional Development Consortium Ltd t/a CPD Standards Office

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 06 May 2026

    Two paid-for Meta ads for a training accreditation company made misleading comparative claims with identifiable competitors which weren’t supported by evidence and couldn’t be verified by consumers.

  • Centre of CPD Excellence

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 18 March 2026

    A website for an accreditation company made misleading claims it had panels of specialists, independent industry experts, accreditation against internationally recognised standards and official relationships with insurance partners.

  • The Secret Diamond Academy

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 26 April 2023

    Two posts on the Facebook page of a beauty salon advertised training courses for sclerotherapy, without making clear the nature, requirements, qualifications and professional registration details of the course.

  • CPD Regulatory Office

    • Upheld
    • Internet
    • 28 August 2024

    A website made misleading claims about being affiliated with government bodies, misleading claims to have accreditation providers that met government-approved standards, and misleadingly using organisations’ names and logos to suggest an affiliation.

  • TJC & BLC Aesthetics Clinic & Training Academy

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 08 November 2023

    A Facebook post misleadingly did not make clear the nature, requirements, qualifications and possible registration details of a course, and contained the claims that the course was “Fully Accredited”, which could not be substantiated.

Informally resolved (3)
  • The CPD Register Ltd

    • 11 December 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

  • The CPD Certification Service Ltd t/a The CPD Certification Service

    • 28 August 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

  • CPD Quality Standards (unconfirmed)

    • 29 January 2025
    • Number of complaints: 1