-
Hutch Games Ltd t/a F1 Clash
An app store listing and in-game storefront for the mobile game ‘F1 Clash’ failed to make clear that it contained loot boxes and misleadingly implied that people had an equal chance of winning different prizes. A third issue was investigated but didn’t break the rules.
-
Kabam Games Inc
An app store listing for the ‘Marvel Contest of Champions’ game failed to make clear that it contained loot boxes.
-
Nexters Global Ltd
An app store listing for the ‘Hero Wars: Alliance RPG’ game failed to make clear that it contained loot boxes.
-
Electronic Arts Ltd t/a EA
Two paid-for Facebook ads for Golf Clash, a mobile app game, omitted material information about the inclusion of loot boxes.
-
Miniclip (UK) Ltd
A paid-for Facebook ad for an online game omitted material information about the inclusion of loot boxes.
-
Hutch Games Ltd
A listing for the game "F1 Clash - Car Racing Manager" on the Apple App store did not make it sufficiently clear that the game contained loot boxes.
-
Hutch Games Ltd
A listing for the game "Rebel Racing" on the Google Play store did not make it sufficiently clear that the game contained loot boxes.
-
Jagex Ltd
A paid-for Facebook ad for online game RuneScape omitted material information about the inclusion of loot boxes.
-
Electronic Arts Ltd t/a EA
A paid-for Facebook ad for a mobile app game did not make it sufficiently clear that the game contained loot boxes.
-
KamaGames Ltd t/a Blackjackist
A paid-for X ad for the Blackjack 21: Blackjackist game misleadingly stated that the game didn’t contain in-game purchases, including random-item purchases.
-
LC International Ltd t/a Ladbrokes
[Republished ruling] A TV and Video on Demand ad for Ladbrokes wasn’t likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.
-
Reed Exhibitions Ltd