Rulings (11)
  • Alliance Winds Ltd t/a linendaily

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 25 February 2026

    A paid-for Meta ad and a website listing for an online clothing company misleadingly claimed they were established and owned by armed forces veterans and that they donated a share of profits to PTSD support organisations.

  • Practice Pal t/a Involve Education (Involve)

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 25 February 2026

    A website for a management information services software provider for schools made misleading and unverifiable comparative claims about competitors’ products.

  • WashWater UK Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Brochure
    • 25 February 2026

    A brochure for a water conditioning and purifying system manufacturer misleadingly implied their water treatment systems could target and remove existing limescale, reduce hot water bills and help improve certain skin conditions. 

  • persons unknown t/a Evora Official

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 25 February 2026

    Four paid-for Facebook ads and a website for a multi-sensory stuffed toy made unlicenced medicinal claims that weren’t backed up by robust evidence, including that the product could relieve symptoms of anxiety and insomnia. The ads also made misleading claims about testimonials and didn’t have evidence to s...

  • FlyDogGame t/a Love and Peace

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 18 February 2026

    A paid-for ad for a mobile game app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by trivialising and condoning violence, including domestic violence.

  • Health Bridge Ltd t/a Zava

    • Upheld
    • Website (ad feature)
    • 18 February 2026

    An advertorial promoting medicated weight-loss seen on the Mumsnet website didn’t make it clear it was an ad, used healthcare professionals to endorse a medicine and promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.

  • Pocket FM Private Ltd

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 18 February 2026

    A paid-for in-app ad for an audiobook app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by referencing sexual assault and sexual violence.

  • Skywork AI Pte t/a Dramawave

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 18 February 2026

    A video ad for a streaming platform was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by featuring content that was sexually explicit and suggested sexual violence.

  • Surge International Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (commercial classified)
    • 18 February 2026

    A listing seen on the job website Indeed.com made misleading claims about the starting salary of a role and failed to make clear that the role was self-employed.

  • Transport For London t/a TFL

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 February 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for Transport for London was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence on the grounds of race by reinforcing a negative stereotype about black men.

  • Whaleco UK Ltd t/a Temu

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 February 2026

    Two paid-for Facebook ads for Temu were misleading by contradicting the terms and conditions that applied to an advertised promotion.