Rulings (10)
  • Eurowings GmbH t/a Eurowings

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 15 July 2026

    A paid-for Google ad for an airline gave a misleading impression of their flights environmental impact and implied that people could pay to fully offset the carbon emissions from a specific flight without suitable evidence to support these claims. 

  • Kind Patches Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 15 July 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a supplement company made claims that a supplement patch could help with weight-loss and made medicinal claims for products that weren’t authorised by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The ad was also socially irresponsible and incl...

  • Parker Products Ltd t/a ParkerBrand

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 15 July 2026

    A website ad for a pressure washer made misleading savings claims and stated savings against previous prices without evidence that the product was normally sold at that price. 

  • Phlo Technologies Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 15 July 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad promoted weight-loss prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules. 

  • Qatar Airways Group QCSC t/a Qatar Airways

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 15 July 2026

    Two paid-for LinkedIn posts for an airline gave a misleading impression of their flights environmental impact and implied that people could pay to fully offset the carbon emissions of a specific flight without suitable evidence to support this claim.   

  • Capgroup Inc Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 08 July 2026

    A website for a whiskey cask and gold coin investment company made misleading claims about investment returns. As well as misleadingly presenting an incorrect Trustpilot score. The ad also failed to make clear that cask whiskey investments were unregulated and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily...

  • Grain Connect Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 08 July 2026

    An email from a broadband company made misleading price rise claims about an identifiable competitor.

  • Mars Wrigley Confectionery UK Ltd t/a Mars

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 08 July 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for M&M’s broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product through the inclusion of a character that depicted a specific less healthy food product.

  • S&E1 Ltd t/a Morley's Woking

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 08 July 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for Morley’s broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.

  • Stove Industry Alliance Ltd t/a Stove Industry Association (SIA)

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 08 July 2026

    [Republished ruling] A website for the Stove Industry Association made unsubstantiated claims that modern stoves emitted significantly lower emissions than open fireplaces or older stoves, and that they were a low-emission way to heat a home. It also failed to make the basis of comparative environmental claims clear.