Rulings (65)
  • Hemingways Marketing Services Ltd t/a Cadbury Gifts Direct

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 11 November 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for Cadbury Gifts Direct didn’t break the less healthy food rules because the advertiser qualified for the exemption for small and medium-sized enterprises.

  • Recro Ltd t/a Casumo

    • Upheld
    • Internet (display)
    • 11 November 2026

    A paid-for online display ad for a gambling website encouraged socially irresponsible behaviour that could lead to financial harm.

  • Antipadia Enterprises Ltd t/a Copymind: AI Twin for Therapy

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 04 November 2026

    Two paid-for Facebook ads for an AI therapy app made medical claims for an app that wasn’t registered with the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and didn’t hold the applicable compliance labels. The ads also discouraged essential treatment for conditions for which medical supervision shoul...

  • GMB Agency LLC t/a Pulmoria

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 04 November 2026

    A paid-for Facebook post for an online supplement brand made claims that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure human disease and made unauthorised specific health claims.

  • Juniper Technologies UK Ltd t/a Juniper

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 04 November 2026

    A pre-roll ad on YouTube for an online pharmacy promoted prescription-only medicines to the public against the law and our rules.

  • MedExpress Enterprises Ltd t/a MedExpress

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 04 November 2026

    An Instagram Story for an online pharmacy promoted prescription-only medicines to the public against the law and our rules. 

  • Menwell Ltd t/a Voy

    • Upheld
    • Video on demand
    • 04 November 2026

    A video-on-demand (VOD) ad for an online pharmacy promoted prescription-only medicines to the public against the law and our rules.

  • Menwell Ltd t/a Voy

    • Poster
    • 04 November 2026

    A poster for an online pharmacy promoted prescription-only medicines to the public against the law and our rules.

  • Walkers Snacks Ltd t/a Walkers

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 04 November 2026

    A TikTok post for Walkers crisps posted by influencer Isabella Hill didn’t break the rules by featuring an identifiable less-healthy product.

  • Optival Ltd t/a bestbookiesandbettingsites.co.uk

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 28 October 2026

    A paid-for search ad for a betting website was irresponsibly targeted.

  • Bingchuan Network (Hong Kong) Co Ltd t/a Last Light: Rebirth

    • Upheld
    • Game (mobile/app)
    • 21 October 2026

    An in-game ad for a mobile strategy game was socially irresponsible, condoned and trivialised violence and included harmful gender stereotypes by objectifying and sexualising women.

  • Celeb Innovations Ltd t/a RiseGuide

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 21 October 2026

    A paid-for YouTube ad for a self-improvement app was socially irresponsible, featured harmful negative racial stereotypes about South Asian women and was likely to cause serious offence on the grounds of race.

  • Chart Prime Trading LLC

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 14 October 2026

    Two paid-for Facebook ads for a financial education platform didn’t make clear that the value of investments could go down as well as up and misleadingly suggested that money could be made quickly with minimal risks. The ads also took advantage of peoples’ potential lack of experience by implying that finan...

  • Finelo Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 14 October 2026

    Two paid-for Facebook ads for a financial education platform didn’t make clear that the value of investments could go down as well as up and misleadingly suggested money could be made quickly with minimal risks. The ads also took advantage of the peoples’ potential lack of experience by implying that financ...

  • HRY Games t/a AI Scorecast

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 14 October 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a data analytics app for football results was socially irresponsible and misleading by implying that people who used the service to make ‘informed’ gambling decisions would be very likely to turn a profit. 

  • Express Healthcare Ltd t/a pharmacyonline

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 07 October 2026

    Two paid-for Meta ads and a website for an online pharmacy made medicinal claims and promoted unlicensed products. They also promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.

  • Juniper Technologies UK Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 07 October 2026

    A paid-for Google ad for an online pharmacy promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.

  • Simple Online Healthcare Ltd t/a Simple Online Pharmacy

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 07 October 2026

    Two paid-for social media ads for an online pharmacy made medicinal claims and promoted unlicensed products. They also promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.

  • Jap Car South Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 23 September 2026

    A website for a car import company was likely to cause serious offence on the grounds of race. 

  • Animcha Ltd t/a tyan.ai

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 16 September 2026

    A paid-for Meta ad for an AI companion generator app was socially irresponsible and caused serious or widespread offence, including by featuring a harmful gender stereotype that objectified and sexualised women. The ad also portrayed someone who was or appeared to be under 18 years of age in a sexual way.