-
High Seat Ltd t/a HSL
A website, two emails and a leaflet didn’t make the limitations for guaranteed Christmas delivery clear.
-
Tesco Stores Ltd
An outdoor digital poster comparing the Tesco Clubcard and Sainsbury’s Nectar loyalty card schemes wasn’t misleading.
-
Wireless Group Media (GB) Ltd t/a Virgin Radio
A promotion on Virgin Radio's website wasn't administered fairly and caused unnecessary disappointment.
-
Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd t/a Samsung
A cashback promotion on the Samsung website caused unnecessary disappointment and wasn’t administered fairly.
-
Excite For Life Ltd
A website made misleading claims that CBD was suitable for consumption by children, incorrectly stated that the recommended maximum consumption of CBD per day for adults was 70 mg and made general health claims that weren't accompanied by an authorised specific health claim.
-
Vape Life Ltd t/a CBDLife UK
A website made misleading claims that CBD was suitable for consumption by children and incorrectly stated that the recommended maximum consumption of CBD per day for adults was 70 mg.
-
JD Sports Fashion plc
A Facebook page, a Facebook reel, a paid-for Facebook post and a poster condoned irresponsible, unsafe driving, but didn’t irresponsibly feature riders not wearing protective gear.
Rulings
Our rulings are published every Wednesday and set out on the public record how, following a formal investigation, the advertising rules apply and where we draw the line in judging whether an ad has broken the rules. We also publish a list of companies and organisations which agree to amend or withdraw their ad without being subject to a formal ruling.
Rulings (7)