Rulings (19)
  • Edrington-Beam Suntory UK

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 06 January 2021

    A TV ad for whisky did not link alcohol with sexual activity and did not breach the BCAP Code.

  • James Murray Solicitors

    • Not upheld
    • Radio
    • 06 January 2021

    A radio ad for a law film was not likely to cause unjustifiable distress and did not breach the BCAP Code.

  • ContextLogic Inc t/a Wish.com

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 November 2020

    A paid-for ad on Facebook was irresponsible for portraying a model who was under 18 years of age in a sexual manner.

  • ContextLogic Inc t/a Wish.com

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 November 2020

    Facebook ads for an online retailer, Wish.com, were irresponsible for appearing to direct ads for restricted firearms and knives to a general audience.

  • Betfair Casino Ltd t/a Betfair Casino

    • Not upheld
    • 07 October 2020

    A TV ad for Betfair did not portray, condone or encourage gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible.

  • Skinny Clinic t/a Germaine Smith and Michel Thompson

    • Upheld
    • 07 October 2020

    Three Instagram posts by a weight loss injection provider which made irresponsible weight loss claims and a website ad which promoted prescription-only medicines to the general public were banned.

  • Skinny Revolution Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 07 October 2020

    Four Instagram post by a weight loss injection provider were banned for making irresponsible weight loss claims, for promoting prescription-only medicines to the general public and for exploiting people’s insecurities around body image during lockdown.

  • SkinnyJab Ltd t/a SkinnyJab

    • Upheld
    • 07 October 2020

    Two Instagram posts by an influencer in association with a weight loss injection provider were banned for promoting prescription-only medicines to the general public and for irresponsibly implying that the product could be used by people who were not overweight.

  • ContextLogic Inc t/a Wish.com

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad), Game (mobile/app)
    • 29 July 2020

    Four in-app ads for the e-commerce platform Wish were banned for placing explicit sexual images in apps that were likely to be used by children.

  • NewDay Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 06 May 2020

    A TV ad for a credit card and balance transfers did not break the rules on social responsibility.

  • Hey Habito Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Television, Video on demand
    • 22 April 2020

    A TV and VOD ad for an online mortgage broker featuring cartoon gory horror was scheduled appropriately to prevent it from likely being seen by young children.

  • ITV Broadcasting Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 08 April 2020

    Two TV ads for a video game were not scheduled inappropriately.

  • Sky UK Ltd t/a Sky, NowTV

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 08 April 2020

    TV ads for a video game and a film were not scheduled inappropriately.

  • Vape Nation Ltd t/a 88Vape

    • Not upheld
    • Transport
    • 18 March 2020

    Two bus posters advertising vaping equipment did not directly target children.

  • Profit Accumulator Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 11 March 2020

    Instagram posts for a betting company were banned for being irresponsible as they suggested matched betting could be a solution to financial concerns.

  • Warner Bros. Entertainment UK Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Other
    • 11 March 2020

    An ad on the Classic Lullabies playlist on Spotify for the film It Chapter Two was irresponsible for causing distress for children.

  • Easy Shopping 4 Home Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (OM 3rd party)
    • 04 March 2020

    A product listing on Amazon for face masks claiming to protect consumers from coronavirus was misleading and irresponsible and likely to cause fear without justifiable reason.

  • Missguided Ltd

    • Upheld in part
    • Poster
    • 04 March 2020

    A poster by a fashion brand objectified women and was likely to cause offence while another was unlikely to break the rules on the same grounds.

  • Novads OU

    • Upheld
    • Internet (on own site), Internet (display)
    • 04 March 2020

    Paid-for display ads and website claims for face masks claiming to protect consumers from coronavirus were misleading and irresponsible and likely to cause fear without justifiable reason.