Rulings (20)
  • LC International Ltd t/a Gala Spins

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 28 October 2020

    A paid-for Facebook post by a gambling company was banned for being of particular appeal to children.

  • Missguided Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Poster
    • 21 October 2020

    Two posters sold by Missguidied were not found to be offensive or irresponsible.

  • Profit Accumulator Ltd t/a Bonus Accumulator

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 14 October 2020

    A paid-for Facebook post and a website post for a betting company were banned for presenting gambling as a way to achieve financial security, for being misleading and for being socially irresponsible.

  • ElectraWorks Ltd t/a BWIN party, Party Poker

    • Upheld
    • 07 October 2020

    A paid-for Google search ad for a betting website irresponsibly suggested consumers could achieve financial security by gambling.

  • Global Brands Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 02 September 2020

    An Instagram post promoting a VK drink did not inappropriately target children.

  • LC International Limited t/a Coral

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 03 June 2020

    A tweet on a gambling company’s Twitter feed broke the rules by presenting a promotion in a way that was likely to encourage potentially harmful gambling behaviour.

  • LC International Ltd t/a Ladbrokes

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 03 June 2020

    A TV ad for a gambling company did not break the rules on encouraging gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible or portray gambling as indispensable.

  • Mizkan Euro Ltd t/a Branston

    • Not upheld
    • Poster
    • 13 May 2020

    A poster ad for vinegar did not condone or encourage poor nutritional habits or an unhealthy lifestyle in children.

  • ITV Broadcasting Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 22 April 2020

    A TV ad for a film was not scheduled inappropriately as children made up only a small proportion of the audience and it was not directed at or likely to be of particular appeal to them.

  • Bacardi Global Brands Ltd t/a Bombay Sapphire Gin

    • Not upheld
    • Video on demand, Cinema
    • 08 January 2020

    A VOD and cinema ad for gin did not break the rules around implying alcohol was capable of changing mood or enhancing creativity.

  • Betway Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Video
    • 08 January 2020

    A YouTube ad for a gambling company broke the rules for featuring an individual who was under the age of 25.

  • Missguided Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 08 January 2020

    A TV ad for a clothing company did not encourage irresponsible drinking.  

  • Nicoventures Retail (UK) Ltd t/a Vype

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 08 January 2020

    Web and YouTube ads were banned for promoting unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes or e-liquids.

  • People Per Hour Ltd t/a PeoplePerHour

    • Upheld
    • 08 January 2020

    A poster ad was banned for perpetuating harmful gender stereotypes.

  • Person(s) unknown t/a The Folly Bar

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 08 January 2020

    An ad seen on Facebook was banned for promoting or condoning excessive alcohol consumption.

  • Ama Vape Lab Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 18 December 2019

    An Instagram post for an e-cigarette retailer was banned for promoting nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components in non-permitted media, and for featuring people who are or seem to be under 25 using e-cigarettes.

  • Attitude Vapes

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 18 December 2019

    An Instagram post for an e-cigarette retailer was banned for promoting nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components in non-permitted media, and for featuring people who are or seem to be under 25 using e-cigarettes.

  • BrewDog Plc

    • Upheld
    • Poster
    • 18 December 2019

    A slogan on an outdoor poster for a brewing company broke the rules around social responsibility and offence.

  • British American Tobacco UK Ltd.

    • Upheld in part
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 18 December 2019

    Instagram posts for an e-cigarette retailer were banned for promoting nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components in non-permitted media, and for featuring people who are or seem to be under 25 using e-cigarettes.

  • Global Vaping Group Ltd t/a Mylo Vape UK

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 18 December 2019

    An Instagram post for an e-cigarette retailer was banned for promoting nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components in non-permitted media, and for featuring people who are or seem to be under 25 using e-cigarettes.