Rulings (25)
  • LC International Limited t/a Coral

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 03 June 2020

    A tweet on a gambling company’s Twitter feed broke the rules by presenting a promotion in a way that was likely to encourage potentially harmful gambling behaviour.

  • LC International Ltd t/a Ladbrokes

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 03 June 2020

    A TV ad for a gambling company did not break the rules on encouraging gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible or portray gambling as indispensable.

  • Mizkan Euro Ltd t/a Branston

    • Not upheld
    • Poster
    • 13 May 2020

    A poster ad for vinegar did not condone or encourage poor nutritional habits or an unhealthy lifestyle in children.

  • ITV Broadcasting Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 22 April 2020

    A TV ad for a film was not scheduled inappropriately as children made up only a small proportion of the audience and it was not directed at or likely to be of particular appeal to them.

  • Bacardi Global Brands Ltd t/a Bombay Sapphire Gin

    • Not upheld
    • Video on demand, Cinema
    • 08 January 2020

    A VOD and cinema ad for gin did not break the rules around implying alcohol was capable of changing mood or enhancing creativity.

  • Betway Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Video
    • 08 January 2020

    A YouTube ad for a gambling company broke the rules for featuring an individual who was under the age of 25.

  • Missguided Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 08 January 2020

    A TV ad for a clothing company did not encourage irresponsible drinking.  

  • Nicoventures Retail (UK) Ltd t/a Vype

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 08 January 2020

    Web and YouTube ads were banned for promoting unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes or e-liquids.

  • People Per Hour Ltd t/a PeoplePerHour

    • Upheld
    • 08 January 2020

    A poster ad was banned for perpetuating harmful gender stereotypes.

  • Person(s) unknown t/a The Folly Bar

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 08 January 2020

    An ad seen on Facebook was banned for promoting or condoning excessive alcohol consumption.

  • Ama Vape Lab Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 18 December 2019

    An Instagram post for an e-cigarette retailer was banned for promoting nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components in non-permitted media, and for featuring people who are or seem to be under 25 using e-cigarettes.

  • Attitude Vapes

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 18 December 2019

    An Instagram post for an e-cigarette retailer was banned for promoting nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components in non-permitted media, and for featuring people who are or seem to be under 25 using e-cigarettes.

  • BrewDog Plc

    • Upheld
    • Poster
    • 18 December 2019

    A slogan on an outdoor poster for a brewing company broke the rules around social responsibility and offence.

  • British American Tobacco UK Ltd.

    • Upheld in part
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 18 December 2019

    Instagram posts for an e-cigarette retailer were banned for promoting nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components in non-permitted media, and for featuring people who are or seem to be under 25 using e-cigarettes.

  • Global Vaping Group Ltd t/a Mylo Vape UK

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 18 December 2019

    An Instagram post for an e-cigarette retailer was banned for promoting nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components in non-permitted media, and for featuring people who are or seem to be under 25 using e-cigarettes.

  • BoomBod Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 23 October 2019

    Ads on Instagram for weight loss products were banned for making unauthorised health claims, claims about rate or amount of weight loss and promoting diet products in an irresponsible way.

  • Protein Revolution Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 23 October 2019

    Ads on Instagram for appetite suppressants were banned for making unauthorised health claims and promoting diet products in an irresponsible way.

  • Itch Petcare Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Poster
    • 16 October 2019

    A billboard ad for flea treatment did not break the rules around harm and offence.

  • Missguided Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Video on demand
    • 16 October 2019

    A VOD ad was banned for objectifying women and being likely to cause offence.

  • Beauty Boutique Aesthetics

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 25 September 2019

    An ad on Instagram for botox was banned for misleading claims and for advertising a prescription-only medicine.