-
UAB Convenity t/a Huusk
A TV ad for Huusk Knives was irresponsibly scheduled.
-
Cloud Whale Interactive Technology
An in-game ad was socially irresponsible, likely to cause serious or widespread offence and was irresponsibly targeted
-
Pressplay Ltd
A press ad for anti-glare driving glasses misleadingly implied they could prevent glare while driving and could make driving safer.
-
Barclays Bank plc
A magazine ad was unlikely to give a misleading impression of Barclay’s overall contribution to carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions.
-
Belle Baby Ltd
A website, which featured a product listing for a swimsuit, included an image of a child portrayed in a sexual way.
-
Hutchison 3G UK Ltd t/a Three Mobile
A national press ad, two paid-for Meta ads and a website for Three Mobile didn’t make misleading ‘best value’ claims.
-
High Seat Ltd t/a HSL
A website, two emails and a leaflet didn’t make the limitations for guaranteed Christmas delivery clear.
-
Luxury Lodge Estates Company Ltd t/a Luxury Lodges
A magazine ad didn’t make clear that the value of investments was variable, and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future. It also failed to make the nature of a guarantee clear and didn’t include non-optional fees.
-
Next Retail Ltd t/a NEXT
A product listing on the NEXT website irresponsibly portrayed a model as being unhealthily thin.
-
ACME Vape Ltd
A cinema ad and post seen on IVG Vape’s LinkedIn page made unsubstantiated health claims and promoted unlicensed nicotine-containing vapes in unpermitted media but wasn’t directed at people under 18 through the selection of media in which it appeared.
-
Churchill Retirement Living Ltd
A national newspaper ad failed to include the significant conditions of a promotion, including a closing date.
-
Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd
A website promotion misleadingly described a promotional item as “free”, did not make clear promotional items would have to be purchased upfront before being redeemed via a cashback mechanism and omitted significant conditions.
-
Gold Warehouse Ltd t/a Gold Bank
A press ad failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.
-
Harrington & Byrne Ltd
A press ad failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future.
-
Stirling Health Ltd
A press ad made medicinal claims for an unauthorised product.
-
Great Grass MCR Ltd t/a Great Grass
A poster was socially irresponsible and caused serious or widespread offence by featuring a harmful gender stereotype and objectifying women.
-
Pegasus Homes Ltd t/a Pegasus Homes
A national newspaper ad for a retirement property company failed to include the significant conditions of a promotion and misleadingly omitted information regarding the price of a service charge.
-
Pegasus Homes Ltd t/a Pegasus Homes
A national newspaper ad for a retirement property company failed to include the significant conditions of a promotion.
-
Prime Star Shop Ltd t/a Branshaws
A press ad made medical claims for an unlicenced product which didn’t hold the relevant compliance labels.
-
Sunspot Tours Ltd t/a Mercury Holidays
A national press ad for a package holiday misleadingly described a holiday as including a "free" week.
-
Kentucky Fried Chicken (Great Britain) Ltd t/a KFC
Topic: Food, drink and supplements