Rulings (9)
  • ATR Brands Ltd t/a Antler

    • Upheld
    • 02 September 2026

    Two emails and a website page for a luggage retailer misleadingly implied a promotion included all products they sold, by stating a promotion related to “everything” or applied “sitewide” when this was not the case. 

  • Stacey’s World Rocks

    • Upheld
    • Messaging app
    • 26 August 2026

    A Telegram post on the Stacey’s World Rocks account was socially irresponsible by encouraging people not to pay household bills.

  • Jaded London Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 05 August 2026

    An email for a clothing brand was socially irresponsible by glamourising smoking.

  • Menwell Ltd t/a Voy

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 27 May 2026

    Three emails for an online pharmacy promoted prescription-only medicines to the public against the law and our rules. The ads were also socially irresponsible by creating an undue sense of urgency for people who were considering medicated weight-loss programmes. 

  • On The Beach Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 11 February 2026

    An email for On The Beach made misleading price comparison claims and failed to make clear if people needed to act quickly to benefit from an advertised lower price. The ad also failed to make the basis of comparisons clear and didn’t provide prominent information to allow people to verify comparisons.

  • DSV Communications Ltd t/a The One Broadband

    • Upheld
    • Direct mail
    • 10 December 2025

    A direct mailing misleadingly suggested that people at a specific address had been identified as having poor broadband connectivity and speeds. Another issue about a circular was informally resolved after the advertiser amended their ad.

  • Storage Giant Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Email, Website (own site)
    • 26 November 2025

    Two web pages and an email for a self-storage company made best price guaranteed claims without evidence to support them. They also failed to make sure that quoted prices reflected the total cost people would pay and didn’t make clear when prices were promotional or subject to significant...

  • Butlins Skyline Ltd t/a Butlins

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 19 November 2025

    An email promotion for Butlins wasn’t administered fairly because the closing date of the promotion was changed

  • Banquist Ltd t/a Winedrops

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Email
    • 05 November 2025

    Two emails and a paid-for Instagram ad for an online wine retailer made misleading and unsubstantiated claims about the origin of their wine. They also failed to make clear the basis of the price comparisons and the significant conditions of the promotion.