Rulings (10)
  • Digital Vapers

    • Upheld
    • Leaflet
    • 18 March 2026

    A leaflet for a vape retailer featuring colourful cartoon-style fruit characters broke the rules by being likely to appeal particularly to people under 18 years of age.

  • Centrica Hive Ltd t/a Hive

    • Upheld
    • National newspaper (paid ad)
    • 04 March 2026

    A national press ad for Hive promoting solar panels didn’t have enough evidence to demonstrate that ‘up to’ saving claims could be achieved by a significant proportion of people and also failed to include all material information.

  • WashWater UK Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Brochure
    • 25 February 2026

    A brochure for a water conditioning and purifying system manufacturer misleadingly implied their water treatment systems could target and remove existing limescale, reduce hot water bills and help improve certain skin conditions. 

  • GGRS Energie Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Local or regional newspaper (paid ad)
    • 26 November 2025

    A regional press ad for GGRS Energie made exaggerated and unsubstantiated savings claims about solar installation and failed to include all material information.

  • Zzoomm plc

    • Upheld
    • Circular
    • 22 October 2025

    A circular letter for a broadband provider wasn’t obviously identifiable as marketing material and misled consumers by presenting it in a way that implied they were important notices on broadband disruption.

  • William Hill Organization Ltd t/a William Hill

    • Upheld
    • Point of sale
    • 24 September 2025

    A promotional voucher for William Hill encouraged irresponsible use.

  • SP Graham Retail Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Circular
    • 27 August 2025

    A voucher for Sean Graham bookmakers didn’t include all the significant conditions of the promotion and also failed to administer the promotion fairly.

  • Lloyds Bank plc t/a Lloyds Banking Group (LBG)

    • Upheld
    • National press
    • 20 August 2025

    A national press ad for Lloyds Bank misleadingly implied that they had made donations to social housing projects and omitted significant information that put these claims into context.

  • Energystore Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Local or regional newspaper (paid ad)
    • 06 August 2025

    A local press ad for a loft and wall cavity insulation installation company was misleading because it omitted material information about the government funding available for installing insulation products.

  • Viridian International Ltd t/a Viridian

    • Upheld
    • Magazine (paid ad), Website (own site)
    • 30 July 2025

    A website and magazine ad made unsubstantiated claims that a supplement didn't contain any ultra-processed ingredients and also discredited and denigrated other nutritional supplements.