-
Electronic Arts Ltd t/a EA
A paid-for Facebook ad for a mobile app game did not make it sufficiently clear that the game contained loot boxes.
-
London Luton Airport Ltd t/a Luton Rising
A magazine ad and a poster for Luton Rising did not adequately qualify the claims made in the ad and omitted material information about the environmental impact of London Luton Airport’s expansion.
-
Wessex Water Services Ltd
A TV ad for Wessex Water did not adequately qualify the environmental claims made in the ad and omitted material information about the company’s environmental impact.
-
Portable Multimedia Ltd
A website made misleading and exaggerated claims about the performance of three advertised dash cams.
-
Future Farm Plant-Based Food UK Ltd t/a Future Farm
The product packaging for a Future Farm Future Burger, seen on 9 February 2024, featured a promotion. Text on the front of the packaging stated, “WIN £1000 BUY ME AND SCAN TO ENTER *T&C’S APPLY”. A QR code was in the centre of the text.
-
AHK Designs Ltd t/a Victoriaplum.com
A website, Instragram account and X account for Victoria Plum made misleaing claims about the longevity of the brand, its customer service reviews and its total number of customers served.
-
Pink Self Storage Ltd
A website ad made misleading claims about price and hidden fees.
-
Mous Products Ltd
A TV ad made misleading claims about the efficacy of a range of phone cases.
-
Sparks Information PTE Ltd t/a Hunting Sniper
A paid-for Facebook ad for Hunting Sniper, a mobile app game, featured realistic footage of harm to animals, which was likely to cause widespread offence and unjustified distress.
-
Easigrass (Distribution) Ltd
A Facebook post and website for artificial grass made misleading claims about recyclability, and misleadingly implied the product was eco friendly.
-
6G Internet Ltd t/a 6Gi
A leaflet for a home broadband provider made misleading claims about providing full fibre broadband.
-
Ford Motor Company Ltd t/a Ford
A paid-for Google ad did not mislead when claiming a car had ‘zero emissions driving’.
-
BMW (UK) Ltd
A paid-for Google ad misleadingly represented a vehicle’s environmental impact.
-
Greater London Authority
A radio ad about the ULEZ expansion misleadingly claimed that one of the most polluted places in London is inside people’s cars.
-
MG Motor UK Ltd
A paid-for Google ad misleadingly represented a vehicle’s environmental impact.
-
Transport For London t/a TFL
A TV ad, radio ads and a press ad for Transport for London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) expansion contained some misleading claims about reductions in levels of nitrous oxide in central London.
-
Churchill Retirement Living Ltd t/a Churchill Retirement Living
A website and a paid-for Facebook ad made misleading claims about savings, and was irresponsible for exploiting the cost of living crisis.
-
AGA Rangemaster Ltd t/a AGA
A website that claimed a cooker had “the lowest running costs for any heat-storage cast-iron range cooker” was misleading, unverifiable and could not be substantiated.
-
Planet Computers Ltd
A website misleadingly stated when a smartphone would be in stock.
-
Zzoomm plc
A direct mailing misleadingly stated the savings someone could make with their broadband service.
-
Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd t/a Samsung
Topic: Computers, phones and telecoms
-
Viabl Ltd
Topic: Delivery, construction and logistics
-
Zen Internet Ltd
Topic: Computers, phones and telecoms
-
Phonely Ltd t/a Phonely
Topic: Computers, phones and telecoms
-
Virgin Media Ltd.
Topic: Computers, phones and telecoms