Rulings (65)
  • Engage Clothing Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 21 July 2021

    An Instagram Story from Carl J Woods was banned for non-disclosure

  • BMW (UK) Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Radio
    • 14 July 2021

    A radio ad for BMW was banned for demonstrating the power of a car in a way that suggested excitement and not in the clear context of safety.

  • BrewDog plc

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 07 July 2021

    A paid-for Instagram post by Brewdog was banned for making misleading nutrition claims for an alcoholic drink and for making other non-permitted nutrition claims.

  • DRTY DRINKS Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 07 July 2021

    Two Instagram posts by a drinks company were banned for making misleading nutrition claims for an alcoholic drink and for encouraging excessive drinking.

  • LC International Ltd t/a Ladbrokes

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 07 July 2021

    A TV ad for Ladbrokes was banned for depicting socially irresponsible gambling behaviour.

  • Long Ashton Holdings Ltd t/a High Water

    • Upheld in part
    • Website (own site)
    • 07 July 2021

    A website post by a drinks company was banned for making non-permitted nutrition claims for an alcoholic drink.

  • Pruvit Ventures Inc

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site), Social media (own site), Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 07 July 2021

    A website post, five Instagram posts and an Instagram Highlights reel for a health company were banned for making unauthorised health claims and for implying that food supplements could treat diseases. 

  • Wild Drinks Group Ltd t/a Whisp Drinks

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 07 July 2021

    A website post by a drinks company was banned for making misleading nutrition claims for an alcoholic drink and for making other non-permitted nutrition claims.

  • Au Vodka Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 30 June 2021

    Seven Instagram and a website post for a vodka company were banned for encouraging excessive drinking, for linking the consumption of alcohol with driving, and for featuring a rapper who under 25 years of age.

  • Person(s) unknown t/a KaiAviation

    • Upheld
    • Magazine (paid ad)
    • 23 June 2021

    A magazine ad for a clothing company was banned for being likely to cause serious or widespread offence by objectifying women.

  • YORKTEST LABORATORIES LTD

    • Upheld
    • Television, Internet (website content)
    • 23 June 2021

    A TV ad and a website post for a nutritional, dietary programme was banned for implying that the testing for the programme could help to alleviate symptoms of migraines or depression.

  • LC International Ltd t/a Ladbrokes

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 16 June 2021

    A paid-for Facebook post for Ladbrokes was not found to be of particular appeal to under-18s and did not breach the Code.

  • UKGBrunch Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 16 June 2021

    Two posts on an event promoter’s Facebook page were banned for encouraging excessive consumption of alcohol.

  • Kentucky Fried Chicken (Great Britain) Ltd t/a KFC

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 09 June 2021

    A TV ad for KFC did not perpetuate negative ethnic stereotypes and was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence.

  • Innate-Essence Ltd t/a Theturmeric.co

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 02 June 2021

    A Facebook post promoting painkiller shots was banned for making claims which were not authorised on the Great Britain nutrition and health claims register.

  • Marathon Alderney Ltd t/a Marathonbet

    • Not upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 19 May 2021

    A Facebook post and a paid-for Facebook ad for a betting company were not found to be misleading.

  • Paul Coleman t/a VIP Inner Circle

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 12 May 2021

    A website ad promoting a gambling company was banned for misleadingly claiming that they offered a money-back guarantee and for irresponsibly suggesting that gambling was a way to achieve financial security.

  • Max Mara Fashion Group Srl

    • Upheld
    • Magazine (paid ad)
    • 05 May 2021

    A magazine ad for a clothing retailer was banned for including a model who appeared unhealthily thin.

  • Justyouroutfit.com Ltd t/a Just Your Outfit

    • Upheld
    • Internet (on own site)
    • 21 April 2021

    Three website listings for clothing products were banned for misleadingly implying that they contained exclusively faux fur with no real animal fur.

  • Babyboo Fashion Pty Ltd t/a Babyboo Fashion

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 14 April 2021

    A paid-for Instagram post by an online clothing retailer was banned for being likely to cause serious or widespread offence by objectifying women.