Rulings (115)
  • Buzz Group Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 09 July 2025

    A post on Buzz Bingo Grimsby’s Facebook page featuring a cartoon action figure wasn’t likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

  • Detox Today

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 09 July 2025

    A website homepage for an alcohol addiction help and support service misleadingly implied that the advertiser directly provided registered medical treatment.

  • GoBrands Euro Intermediate Holdings SARL t/a gopuff

    • Upheld in part
    • Website (own site)
    • 09 July 2025

    A website for a Grocery delivery service which was promoting an ‘Aldi Price Match’ implied that all non-optional fees were included in the price match when this wasn’t the case, but didn’t present pricing information in a misleading way.

  • PepsiCo International Ltd t/a Lipton Tea

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 09 July 2025

    An Instagram and TikTok post by Lipton Ice Tea misleadingly gave the impression that the Peach Lipton Ice Tea was being discontinued.

  • Good Guru Ltd t/a Protein World

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 02 July 2025

    An email made claims that a food could treat anorexia.

  • LEBOM Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 02 July 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad and a paid-for X ad encouraged gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible and encouraged excessive drinking.

  • Mondelez UK Ltd t/a Cadbury

    • Upheld
    • Radio
    • 02 July 2025

    A radio ad made nutrition and comparative nutrition claims that didn’t meet the conditions of use for those claims.

  • Koi Footwear Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 18 June 2025

    An email was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence by condoning drug use.

  • CLF Distribution Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 11 June 2025

    An email misleadingly claimed that products only contained “naturally sweet ingredients”.

  • Diesel SpA t/a Diesel

    • Upheld in part
    • Website (paid ad)
    • 11 June 2025

    A paid-for ad featuring Katie Price was irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence by objectifying and sexualising women.

  • LC International Ltd t/a Ladbrokes

    • Upheld
    • Television, Video on demand
    • 11 June 2025

    A TV and Video on Demand ad featured content that was reflective of youth culture and was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

  • Mars Wrigley Confectionery UK Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Television, Video on demand
    • 11 June 2025

    A TV and Video on Demand ad condoned unsafe driving.

  • LiveScore Betting & Gaming (Gibraltar) Ltd t/a LiveScore Bet

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 04 June 2025

    Two in-app ads seen on the LiveScore app were inappropriately targeted towards under-18s.

  • AirDoctor LLC t/a AmazingAir

    • Upheld
    • 28 May 2025

    A post on the health.detective Garstang Health Food Store’s TikTok account wasn't obviously identifiable as an ad and made medical claims for an unlicensed product.

  • UAB Convenity t/a Huusk

    • Upheld
    • 28 May 2025

    A TV ad for Huusk Knives was irresponsibly scheduled. 

  • Viva Research Ltd t/a Vivanmn

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 28 May 2025

    Two paid-for Facebook ads claimed that a food supplement could treat or cure ADHD, made medicinal claims for an unlicensed product and made unauthorised specific health claims. 

  • air up GmbH

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 28 May 2025

    A paid-for TikTok ad was irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offense.

  • GreenPixel Ltd t/a Hotel Merge Empire

    • Upheld
    • Game (mobile/app)
    • 21 May 2025

    An in-game ad was likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by condoning domestic violence.

  • Phusion Projects LLC t/a FourLoko

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 21 May 2025

    An Instagram ad was socially irresponsible and encouraged people to adopt an unwise drinking style. 

  • ZOE Ltd t/a Zoe

    • Upheld
    • 21 May 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad misleadingly claimed that a supplement didn't contain any ultra-processed ingredients.

Informally resolved (10)
  • Toolport GmbH t/a House of Tents

    • 06 November 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Home and garden

  • G.Network Communications Ltd

    • 07 August 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Media: Internet
    Topic: Sports, leisure and hobbies

  • Jetline Travel Ltd t/a Jetline Travel

    • 07 August 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Media: Email
    Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring

  • Direct Ferries Ltd t/a Direct Ferries

    • 24 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring

  • Kentucky Fried Chicken (Great Britain) Ltd t/a KFC

    • 24 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Food, drink and supplements

  • Veblen Wines Ltd

    • 24 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Alcohol

  • We Love Holidays Ltd t/a LoveHolidays

    • 24 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring

  • GoBrands Euro Intermediate Holdings SARL t/a gopuff

    • 17 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Media: Internet
    Topic: Vaping, smoking and drugs

  • Naked Wines plc t/a Naked Wines, www.NakedWines.com Ltd

    • 17 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Media: Circular
    Topic: Alcohol

  • X-Clusive Competitions Ltd

    • 17 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Media: Internet
    Topic: Gambling