Rulings (33)
  • Charlie Johnson

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 15 October 2025

    Two paid-for social media ads by Charlie Johnson, a business coach in the fitness industry, misleadingly implied that claimed lifestyle and earning results were typical and that a promotion was time limited when this wasn’t the case.

  • Grant Cardone Training Technologies Inc t/a Grant Cardone

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 15 October 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad for an online business event by businessman Grant Cardone misleadingly implied that claimed earnings results were typical.

  • Jessica Crane Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)
    • 15 October 2025

    A paid-for Facebook and Instagram ad for a wealth and business coach company, run by Jessica Crane, misleadingly implied that lifestyle and earnings results were typical, misled in relation to the content of training material available for free and made unsubstantiated claims about the number of top salon owners using ...

  • Robbins Research International Inc t/a Tony Robbins

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 15 October 2025

    A paid-for Facebook post by Tony Robbins advertising a business coaching course misleadingly implied that claimed earnings results were typical.

  • Self Made Girl Boss Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 15 October 2025

    A paid-for Instagram post for a business coaching company, misleadingly implied that stated lifestyle and earning results were typical, included qualifications that contradicted the claims that they qualified, and failed to make the distinction between free and priced items clear.

  • Community Fibre Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 08 October 2025

    Two pages on the Community Fibre website misleadingly implied that they were the number one rated for internet provider and that they had the most 5 star reviews on third party website. 

  • Simmer Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 17 September 2025

    A paid-for TikTok ad for a meal prep service misleadingly implied that their menu was curated by chefs who had been awarded a Michelin star.

  • Dr Vegan Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 10 September 2025

    An Instagram post for Dr Vegan Ltd claimed that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure symptoms of the menopause and made medicinal claims for products that weren’t authorised by the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency.

  • BetterVits LLC

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 03 September 2025

    An Instagram post by the influencer Doctor Shireen made unauthorised health claims in relation to food supplements, exaggerated authorised health claims and made health claims that referred to the recommendation of an individual health professional, which is against the rules in ads for food supplements.

  • Domino's Pizza UK & Ireland Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 27 August 2025

    A paid-for YouTube ad for a HFSS product wasn’t appropriately targeted and appeared in media that was likely to appeal to under-16s.

  • Lloyds Bank plc t/a Lloyds Banking Group (LBG)

    • Upheld
    • National press
    • 20 August 2025

    A national press ad for Lloyds Bank misleadingly implied that they had made donations to social housing projects and omitted significant information that put these claims into context.

  • Arrae Inc

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 06 August 2025

    Two paid-for Meta ads for food supplements made unauthorised and misleading medical and health claims for weight loss.

  • Myota GmbH

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 06 August 2025

    Two paid-for Facebook ads for food supplements made unauthorised and misleading medical and health claims for weight loss.

  • Ovira Australia t/a Ovira UK

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 06 August 2025

    Two paid-for Meta ads for food supplements made unauthorised and misleading medical and health claims for weight loss.

  • The Clean Supps LLC t/a Inno Supps

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 06 August 2025

    Two paid-for Meta ads for food supplements made unauthorised and misleading medical and health claims for weight loss.

  • Reform Technologies Ltd t/a Reformed

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 30 July 2025

    A paid-for Pinterest ad for a matcha drink was socially irresponsible, including by encouraging irresponsible dietary habits.

  • Viridian International Ltd t/a Viridian

    • Upheld
    • Magazine (paid ad), Website (own site)
    • 30 July 2025

    A website and magazine ad made unsubstantiated claims that a supplement didn't contain any ultra-processed ingredients and also discredited and denigrated other nutritional supplements.

  • Trip Drink Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 16 July 2025

    A website for TRIP drinks, made unauthorised claims that the drink could prevent, cure or treat human disease. As well as unauthorised nutrition and health claims.

  • GoBrands Euro Intermediate Holdings SARL t/a gopuff

    • Upheld in part
    • Website (own site)
    • 09 July 2025

    A website for a Grocery delivery service which was promoting an ‘Aldi Price Match’ implied that all non-optional fees were included in the price match when this wasn’t the case, but didn’t present pricing information in a misleading way.

  • PepsiCo International Ltd t/a Lipton Tea

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 09 July 2025

    An Instagram and TikTok post by Lipton Ice Tea misleadingly gave the impression that the Peach Lipton Ice Tea was being discontinued.