-
Currys Group Ltd t/a Currys
A paid-for Facebook ad for Currys was misleading and socially irresponsible by implying that e-scooters could be ridden on public roads.
-
JLG Legal Ltd t/a Johnson Law Group
A Google paid-for search ad, a paid-for Facebook ad and website for Johnson Law Group, relating to group action compensation claims by diesel vehicle owners and lessees, failed to make clear that by providing their details and e-signing, people were signing a legally binding contract to join a group action claim, omitt...
-
Ambassador Cruise Holidays Ltd
An email advertising offers on cruises made misleading savings claims.
-
Trainline.com Ltd
A Video on Demand ad and a radio ad for Trainline made misleading and unsubstantiated claims that they offered the cheapest ticket prices.
-
Amazing Giveaways Ltd
A Facebook post for a prize draw wasn't administered fairly and caused unnecessary disappointment.
-
We Buy Any Car Ltd t/a webuyanycar.com
A TV and YouTube ad made misleading comparative claims with identifiable competitors.
-
We Love Holidays Ltd t/a LoveHolidays
Two holiday listings on the loveholidays website made misleading price claims.
-
Wowcher Ltd
A website failed to administer a promotion fairly and caused unnecessary disappointment.
-
Mars Wrigley Confectionery UK Ltd
A TV and Video on Demand ad condoned unsafe driving.
-
Rosenthal Capital Ltd t/a ULEZProsperity
A website made misleading and unsubstantiated investment returns claims and promoted a financial product in a way that couldn't be easily understood.
-
ABD Supplies Ltd
Two emails and two product listings misleadingly and irresponsibly suggested that HID and LED conversion kits could be used by most vehicles on public roads.
-
Holiday Gems Ltd
A booking webpage for a holiday made misleading price claims.
-
Groupe SEB UK Ltd t/a Tefal
A website product page for a set of pans misleadingly implied that a discount offer could be used for particular products when that was not the case.
-
Pressplay Ltd
A press ad for anti-glare driving glasses misleadingly implied they could prevent glare while driving and could make driving safer.
-
Rosenthal Capital Ltd t/a ULEZPROSPERITY
Two radio ads which implied that buying and letting cars had investment potential were broadcast on a non-specialist station.
-
Haven Leisure Ltd
A paid-for Facebook ad and website made misleading price claims.
-
Shop TJC Ltd t/a Ideal World
A teleshopping presentation made unsubstantiated price and savings claims.
-
Maki Online Services Ltd
An email misrepresented the consequences of not renewing an expired document and didn't make clear that an eVisa could be obtained for free via the Government’s website.
-
Meggan Kirkland
A promotion on Meggan Kirkland’s Instagram account wasn’t administered fairly.
-
Secret Escapes Ltd
A website made misleading price comparisons and failed to make the basis of price comparisons clear.
Rulings
Our rulings are published every Wednesday and set out on the public record how, following a formal investigation, the advertising rules apply and where we draw the line in judging whether an ad has broken the rules. We also publish a list of companies and organisations which agree to amend or withdraw their ad without being subject to a formal ruling.
Rulings (27)