Rulings (43)
  • Mars Wrigley Confectionery UK Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Television, Video on demand
    • 11 June 2025

    A TV and Video on Demand ad condoned unsafe driving.

  • Neilson Financial Services Ltd t/a British Seniors

    • Not upheld
    • 28 May 2025

    A TV ad didn't show an infant in an unsafe sleep position.   

  • Turner Lewis Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 28 May 2025

    A TikTok post and a website misled people about the nature of their business, omitted material information, took advantage of people's inexperience and credulity and failed to be upfront about significant qualifications. 

  • Rosenthal Capital Ltd t/a ULEZProsperity

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 07 May 2025

    A website made misleading and unsubstantiated investment returns claims and promoted a financial product in a way that couldn't be easily understood.

  • ABD Supplies Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Email, Website (own site)
    • 23 April 2025

    Two emails and two product listings misleadingly and irresponsibly suggested that HID and LED conversion kits could be used by most vehicles on public roads.

  • FX Compared Ltd t/a FXcompared

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 23 April 2025

    A website made misleading savings claims and implied that the international money transfer providers they recommended were the top providers compared to all other providers when they only included providers from a limited sector of the market. It also failed to make clear that a result listing was an ad. 

  • Holiday Gems Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 23 April 2025

    A booking webpage for a holiday made misleading price claims.

  • Pressplay Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Press other (paid ad)
    • 16 April 2025

    A press ad for anti-glare driving glasses misleadingly implied they could prevent glare while driving and could make driving safer.

  • Rosenthal Capital Ltd t/a ULEZPROSPERITY

    • Upheld
    • Radio
    • 02 April 2025

    Two radio ads which implied that buying and letting cars had investment potential were broadcast on a non-specialist station.

  • Haven Leisure Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 19 March 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad and website made misleading price claims.

  • Maki Online Services Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 26 February 2025

    An email misrepresented the consequences of not renewing an expired document and didn't make clear that an eVisa could be obtained for free via the Government’s website.   

  • Intelligent Lending Ltd t/a Ocean Finance

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Internet (display)
    • 19 February 2025

    A paid-for Meta ad and display ad irresponsibly encouraged consumers to spend regularly on non-essential purchases using a credit card.

  • Secret Escapes Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 19 February 2025

    A website made misleading price comparisons and failed to make the basis of price comparisons clear.

  • Connect UK Sales Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)
    • 12 February 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad and website landing page didn’t make clear that the value of investments was variable and failed to provide evidence to substantiate investment claims and price comparisons.

  • Family Vision Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 12 February 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad irresponsibly encouraged the use of credit agreements to fund Christmas spending.

  • Land Profits EDU Ltd t/a Land Profits

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)
    • 12 February 2025

    Two paid-for Facebook posts and a website didn’t make clear that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future and also failed to substantiate objective claims.

  • Luxury Lodge Estates Company Ltd t/a Luxury Lodges

    • Upheld
    • Magazine (paid ad)
    • 12 February 2025

    A magazine ad didn’t make clear that the value of investments was variable, and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future. It also failed to make the nature of a guarantee clear and didn’t include non-optional fees.

  • SteadyPay Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 12 February 2025

    A paid-for Meta ad irresponsibly encouraged people to borrow money for the Black Friday sales and to spend more than they could afford.

  • Zimran Ltd t/a Prosperi Academy

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Internet (video)
    • 15 January 2025

    A paid-for YouTube ad for an app offering financial investment training courses didn't make clear that the value of investments was variable and irresponsibly took advantage of people's lack of experience by implying that investment was straightforward and that large returns could be made with minimal time and ...

  • Vacaciones eDreams, S.L. t/a eDreams

    • Upheld
    • Internet (display)
    • 08 January 2025

    Two paid-for online display ads made unsubstantiated environmental claims.

Informally resolved (3)
  • Jetline Travel Ltd t/a Jetline Travel

    • 07 August 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Media: Email
    Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring

  • Direct Ferries Ltd t/a Direct Ferries

    • 24 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring

  • We Love Holidays Ltd t/a LoveHolidays

    • 24 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring