Rulings (7)

  • idesigngold.com

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 04 December 2019

    A post on Katie Price’s Instagram was not obviously identifiable as an ad.

  • Zoe de Pass t/a Dress Like A Mum (DLAM)

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 20 November 2019

    An Instagram post was not obviously identifiable as an ad.

  • Active Posture Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 13 November 2019

    Claims on Facebook by a clothing company that its product could improve posture and reduce back pain were misleading.  

  • Matalan Retail Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 30 October 2019

    A blog post broke our rules for containing affiliate links which were not correctly labelled as marketing communications.

  • Boohoo.com UK Ltd

    • Upheld
    • E-mail
    • 16 October 2019

    An email from a clothing retailer was found to be socially irresponsible.

  • Brooks Brothers UK Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 18 September 2019

    An Instagram post by influencer Matthew Zorpas was banned for not being obviously identifiable as an ad.

  • Cris Conf SpA t/a Pinko

    • Not Upheld
    • Internet (display)
    • 29 May 2019

    A display ad for Pinko, a clothing retailer, seen on The Guardian website on 22 February 2019 featured a female model posing. The model was wearing a trouser jumpsuit, a long sleeved sequined jacket and a hat.

Informally resolved (3)

  • Harrington & Byrne Ltd

    • 04 December 2019
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Media: National press
    Topic: Clothing, shoes and jewellery

  • In The Style Fashion Ltd

    • 04 December 2019
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Media: Internet (sales promotion)
    Topic: Clothing, shoes and jewellery

  • Splendor SA

    • 04 December 2019
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Media: National press
    Topic: Clothing, shoes and jewellery, Pricing and charges

Mail order cases (0)
Database cases (0)