Rulings (12)
  • CrypticKits

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 22 November 2023

    A TikTok post and Instagram post misleadingly implied that people could buy football shirts for £1

  • Whaleco UK Ltd t/a Temu

    • Upheld
    • Internet (display), App (paid ad)
    • 01 November 2023

    Four display ads and an in-app ad for Temu were sexually graphic and likely to cause widespread offence; sexualised someone who was a child; sexually objectified women; and were inappropriately targeted.

  • Prettylittlething.com Ltd t/a Prettylittlething.com

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 27 September 2023

    An email ad failed to administer a pricing promotion via a discount code fairly.

  • Celine SA

    • Upheld
    • National press
    • 20 September 2023

    An ad in a magazine featured a model who appeared unhealthy thin and was irresponsible.

  • Maje SAS t/a Maje SAS

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 20 September 2023

    A paid-for Instagram post featured a model who appeared unhealthy thin and was irresponsible.

  • JD Sports Fashion plc

    • Upheld
    • Poster
    • 30 August 2023

    A poster for JD Sports and Adidas irresponsibly portrayed unsafe driving practices.

  • Sisters & Seekers Ltd t/a Sisters & Seekers

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 16 August 2023

    A website for a clothing brand irresponsibly glamorised smoking and featured people who appeared to be under 25 years of age.

  • Gemporia Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 05 July 2023

    Two teleshopping presentations for a jewellery retailer made misleading saving claims and price statements.

  • Warehouse Fashions Online Ltd t/a Warehouse

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 21 June 2023

    A product listing on a fashion retailer’s website irresponsibly featured a model who appeared unhealthily thin. 

  • JD Sports Fashion plc

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 17 May 2023

    An Instagram post on KSI’s account was not obviously identifiable as an ad.

  • Ann Summers Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 12 April 2023

    A TV ad for lingerie was not likely to cause offence and was scheduled appropriately to limit the number of children likely to view it. 

  • Gymshark Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 08 February 2023

    A website for a fitness brand misleadingly claimed that their express delivery option meant items would be delivered the next day.