-
Under Armour UK Ltd
A website ad for Under Armour misleadingly stated that a T-shirt could improve the wearer’s strength and endurance.
-
Lemongrassrice Ltd
A paid-for Facebook post by an online retailer made misleading claims that its product, a bra, could reduce the risk of breast cancer.
-
Boohoo.com UK Ltd
Discount claims in an email and website misleadingly implied all products would be discounted and a countdown clock on the website misleadingly implied the offers were time-limited.
-
Sorelle UK Brand Ltd
Product listings on a website for faux fur jackets were misleading because the advertiser was unable to demonstrate that their products did not contain real animal fur.
-
Asos.com Ltd
An Instagram story that contained an affiliate link was not obviously identifiable as an ad.
-
Missguided Ltd
A poster by a fashion brand objectified women and was likely to cause offence while another was unlikely to break the rules on the same grounds.
-
Prettylittlething.com Ltd t/a Prettylittlething.com
An ad on YouTube for a clothing retailer was banned for objectifying women.
-
Prettylittlething[dot]com Ltd
An Instagram post broke the rules for not being obviously identifiable as an ad.
-
idesigngold.com
A post on Katie Price’s Instagram was not obviously identifiable as an ad.
-
Zoe de Pass t/a Dress Like A Mum (DLAM)
An Instagram post was not obviously identifiable as an ad.
-
Active Posture Ltd
Claims on Facebook by a clothing company that its product could improve posture and reduce back pain were misleading.
-
Matalan Retail Ltd
A blog post broke our rules for containing affiliate links which were not correctly labelled as marketing communications.
-
Boohoo.com UK Ltd
An email from a clothing retailer was found to be socially irresponsible.
-
Harrington & Byrne Ltd
Media: National press
Topic: Clothing, shoes and jewellery -
In The Style Fashion Ltd
Media: Internet (sales promotion)
Topic: Clothing, shoes and jewellery -
Splendor SA
Media: National press
Topic: Clothing, shoes and jewellery, Pricing and charges