Rulings (32)
  • Dribble Media Ltd t/a Midnite

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 17 September 2025

    A post on Midnite’s X page featuring an AI generated video depicting footballer Trent Alexander-Arnold had strong appeal to under-18s.

  • KamaGames Ltd t/a Blackjackist

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 03 September 2025

    A paid-for X ad for the Blackjack 21: Blackjackist game misleadingly stated that the game didn’t contain in-game purchases, including random-item purchases.

  • SP Graham Retail Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Circular
    • 27 August 2025

    A voucher for Sean Graham bookmakers didn’t include all the significant conditions of the promotion and also failed to administer the promotion fairly.

  • Team RH Fitness Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 27 August 2025

    A webpage advertising a health and fitness app was misleading as it failed to make clear that a subscription had a minimum commitment period of a 12-months.

  • Inkitt GmbH t/a Inkitt

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 06 August 2025

    An in-app ad was not appropriately targeted and contained scenes that condoned sexually violent behaviour and were likely to cause serious and widespread offence.

  • Hollywoodbets International UK Ltd t/a Hollywoodbets

    • Upheld
    • Website (paid ad)
    • 23 July 2025

    A banner ad for Hollywood bets seen on the Virtual Football League website was inappropriately targeted to under-18s.

  • Mecca Bingo Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 16 July 2025

    A Facebook post featuring emojis for a game to guess film names, wasn't likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

  • Play’n GO Malta Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (display)
    • 16 July 2025

    Three banner ads promoting casino gaming content were likely to have strong appeal to under-18s and were therefore irresponsible.

  • Buzz Group Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 09 July 2025

    A post on Buzz Bingo Grimsby’s Facebook page featuring a cartoon action figure wasn’t likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

  • LEBOM Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 02 July 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad and a paid-for X ad encouraged gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible and encouraged excessive drinking.

  • LC International Ltd t/a Ladbrokes

    • Upheld
    • Television, Video on demand
    • 11 June 2025

    A TV and Video on Demand ad featured content that was reflective of youth culture and was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

  • LiveScore Betting & Gaming (Gibraltar) Ltd t/a LiveScore Bet

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 04 June 2025

    Two in-app ads seen on the LiveScore app were inappropriately targeted towards under-18s.

  • GreenPixel Ltd t/a Hotel Merge Empire

    • Upheld
    • Game (mobile/app)
    • 21 May 2025

    An in-game ad was likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by condoning domestic violence.

  • Whaleco UK Ltd t/a Temu

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 07 May 2025

    An in-game ad was likely to cause serious or widespread offence.

  • Groupon International Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 30 April 2025

    A website made misleading pricing and savings claims.

  • 2XU UK Limited

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 16 April 2025

    A paid-for Instagram ad for 2xu Recovery Compression Tights made medical claims without holding the applicable conformity marking and were not registered with the MHRA.

  • Fitzdares Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 16 April 2025

    A post on ex-England cricketer, Stuart Broad’s X page promoting a bookmaker did not break our gambling rules as he was not likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

  • A3 Games Pte Ltd t/a Top Girl

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 26 March 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad was socially irresponsible and caused serious or widespread offence, including by featuring a harmful gender stereotype by objectifying and sexualising women.

  • Stars Interactive Ltd t/a PokerStars

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 26 March 2025

    An Instagram ad portrayed gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible by trivialising gambling, encouraging repetitive participation and describing gambling as an investment.

  • Wilton Bradley Ltd t/a Xootz

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site), Television
    • 12 February 2025

    A TV ad and product page was misleading and socially irresponsible by failing to disclose that private e-scooters couldn’t be legally used in public places.