-
GMG Pharmacy Ltd t/a The IV Clinic
on its homepage titled “IV DRIPS MENU” which listed the intravenous (IV) drips services
GMG Pharmacy Ltd. The complainant challenged whether the claimed health benefits of the IV drips were misleading and could be substantiated. GMG Pharmacy Ltd t/a The IV Clinic said the IV drips they tests for patients before recommending an IV drip and only highly trained staff administered the
-
Get A Drip Ltd
The Get A Drip website www.getadrip.co.uk, seen 7 February 2019, listed the intravenous (IV) drip of the drips linked to individual pages which included claims about the benefits of each of the IV drips.
complainant challenged whether the claimed health benefits of the IV drips were misleading and could be substantiated. Get A Drip Ltd said the IV drips they used were manufactured by the company concentration level that was achievable if administered via IV drip, but not via oral supplementation
-
REVIV UK Ltd t/a REVIV
the intravenous (IV) drips available and their prices: “Hydromax™ ¦ Hydration IV ; Deluxe IV”. The IV drip names were linked to individual pages which included additional claims about the health benefits of each of the drips.
ASA challenged whether the claimed health benefits of the IV drips were misleading and could be substantiated. REVIV UK Ltd t/a REVIV said they gave a specific formulation for an IV drip for each of wellness service, rather than just a product; the IV drips could not be directly purchased from the website
-
IV Drip Clinic Ltd
-
SOS Hydration Inc