Rulings (5)

  • Steven Thomas

    • Upheld
    • 02 February 2022

    stated, “REMEMBER … mRNA vaccines have never previously been used on humans … The phase 3 Coronavirus

    Coronavirus/Covid-19 vaccine trails end in 2023 meaning these ‘vaccines’ are experimental … Covid

  • Stacey Bradley

    • Upheld
    • Newspaper
    • 25 May 2022

    Two local press ads, one print and one digital, misleadingly implied they had been placed, endorsed or approved by a public body and misleadingly implied COVID-19 vaccinations were unsafe and illegal. They were socially irresponsible and caused fear without justifiable reason.

  • Freudenberg Household Products LP t/a Vileda

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 11 August 2021

    An email from an industry news outlet was banned for implying that their microfibre cloth could remove Covid-19 with a high level of efficacy without having sufficient evidence to substantiate the claim.

  • Copper Clothing Ltd t/a Copper Clothing

    • Upheld
    • Radio
    • 13 October 2021

    A radio ad for a facemask was banned for misleadingly implying that it could rapidly de-activate COVID-19 particles.

  • Cignpost Diagnostics Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Newspaper
    • 21 July 2021

    A newspaper ad for a PCR testing programme was banned for promoting behaviour that contradicted government advice on social distancing.

Informally resolved (3)

  • NoteMachine UK Ltd

    • 26 January 2022
    • Number of complaints: 1

  • Energy Saving Grants Ltd

    • 11 August 2021
    • Number of complaints: 1

  • Our Healthier South East London

    • 07 September 2022
    • Number of complaints: 0

Mail order cases (0)
Database cases (0)