-
Privax Ltd t/a HMA VPN
A TV ad for a virtual private network did not make misleading claims about the security benefit of the product.
-
NordVPN SA t/a NordVPN, Norton 360
A Radio ad for an internet security company misleadingly claimed that the product could protect users against all malware attacks.
-
Surfshark B.V. t/a Surfshark
A paid-for ad in a YouTube video for a VPN service containing violent scenes was likely to cause unjustified distress to viewers, was irresponsibly targeted and unsuitable for delivery to a general audience.
-
Surfshark Ltd
A YouTube video ad by Surfshark was banned for being likely to cause fear or distress without justifiable reason.
-
Tefincom SA t/a NordVPN
VPN. Help protect your privacy and enjoy advanced internet security.” On-screen text stated
protection nor provide any defence against internet censorship like a VPN did. They said that while a that a VPN encrypted all user’s Internet traffic upon leaving a device. They said traffic would then be routed through an encrypted tunnel and sent to a VPN server along with thousands of other
-
Express Technologies Ltd
-
Express Technologies Ltd