-
Glamour Shots
A paid-for Google search ad for eBay was irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence by objectifying and sexualising women.
-
Cosmos Oyun Yazilim Sanayi Ticaret Ltd Sirketi t/a Filter AI
An in-game ad was socially irresponsible and caused serious offence, including by featuring a harmful gender stereotype that objectified women.
-
Wuxi Zhan'ao E-commerce Co Ltd t/a Lpows.com
A paid-for YouTube ad featured a gender stereotype that was likely to cause harm or serious offence.
-
HOMA Games SAS
An in-game ad was socially irresponsible and caused serious or widespread offence, including by featuring a harmful stereotype by objectifying women.
-
Honeytech Ltd t/a Honeytoon
Two paid-for X ads were socially irresponsible, featured harmful gender stereotypes and caused serious or widespread offence, including referencing incest, featuring scenes that depicted women as objects of sexual gratification and trivialising sexual assault.
-
Diesel SpA t/a Diesel
A paid-for ad featuring Katie Price was irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence by objectifying and sexualising women.
-
AirDoctor LLC t/a AmazingAir
A post on the health.detective Garstang Health Food Store’s TikTok account wasn't obviously identifiable as an ad and made medical claims for an unlicensed product.
-
UAB Convenity t/a Huusk
A TV ad for Huusk Knives was irresponsibly scheduled.
-
air up GmbH
A paid-for TikTok ad was irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offense.
-
GreenPixel Ltd t/a Hotel Merge Empire
An in-game ad was likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by condoning domestic violence.
-
Cloud Whale Interactive Technology
An in-game ad was socially irresponsible, likely to cause serious or widespread offence and was irresponsibly targeted
-
Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals t/a RSPCA
A YouTube video, TV ad and poster didn't misleadingly represent the welfare standards afforded to animals farmed under the RSPCA Assured scheme.
-
Whaleco UK Ltd t/a Temu
An in-game ad was likely to cause serious or widespread offence.
-
The Innovative Brewing Company Ltd t/a Prime Time Lager
A poster ad for Prime Time Lager made health and nutrition claims not permitted for alcoholic drinks.
-
Belle Baby Ltd
A website, which featured a product listing for a swimsuit, included an image of a child portrayed in a sexual way.
-
EE Ltd t/a EE
A TV, radio, paid-for social media and digital poster ad for EE made unsubstantiated claims about the performance and capabilities of a Wi-Fi router.
-
Floor Design Ltd t/a Flooring by Nature
A website failed to substantiate environmental claims and didn’t make clear that these claims referred to only part of a carpet, and the actions people would need to take for their carpet to successfully biodegrade.
-
High Seat Ltd t/a HSL
A website, two emails and a leaflet didn’t make the limitations for guaranteed Christmas delivery clear.
-
Next Retail Ltd t/a NEXT
A product listing on the NEXT website irresponsibly portrayed a model as being unhealthily thin.
-
Tesco Stores Ltd
An outdoor digital poster comparing the Tesco Clubcard and Sainsbury’s Nectar loyalty card schemes wasn’t misleading.
-
Toolport GmbH t/a House of Tents
Topic: Home and garden
-
Build Hollywood Ltd
Media: Other
Topic: Charity, education and Third sector -
Kentucky Fried Chicken (Great Britain) Ltd t/a KFC
Topic: Food, drink and supplements
-
Veblen Wines Ltd
Topic: Alcohol