Rulings (40)
  • Haikou Chengfa Technology Co Ltd t/a Aurai Ai

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 11 February 2026

    A paid-for YouTube ad for an AI role play app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence, including by featuring expletives and content that condoned sexually violent behaviour.

  • The Walt Disney Company Ltd t/a Twentieth Century Studios

    • Upheld
    • Poster (digital video)
    • 11 February 2026

    An outdoor digital video poster for the film Predator Badlands was likely to cause fear and distress for young children and was displayed in a place where it could be seen by people of all ages.

  • persons unknown t/a Animals Solitaire: Protect

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 04 February 2026

    An in-game ad for a mobile game app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by objectifying and sexualising women and featuring a harmful gender stereotype.

  • Dreame International Hong Kong Ltd t/a Stary PTE Ltd

    • Upheld
    • App (own claim)
    • 28 January 2026

    Two in-app ads for a romantic fiction app were socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence including by trivialising or condoning violence against women and girls and featuring sexually explicit content. The ads also were irresponsibly targeted.

  • Vodafone Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Poster, Social media (paid ad), Television
    • 07 January 2026

    Six ads for Vodafone were misleading by making an implied comparative claim without objectively comparing one or more specific verifiable features. 

  • OTTY Sleep Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 17 December 2025

    A website page for a mattress company made misleading savings claims.

  • Magic Tavern Inc

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 10 December 2025

    Three paid-for Meta ads for a mobile app game were socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by normalising, condoning and making light of domestic violence, abusive relationships, and bullying, by objectifying women and by presenting gender stereotypes in a way that would like...

  • Pernod Ricard UK Ltd t/a Absolut

    • Not upheld
    • Poster
    • 10 December 2025

    Digital escalator panels, posters and vinyl wall displays for Absolut Vodka were unlikely to particularly appeal to under-18s.

  • Stove Industry Alliance Ltd t/a Stove Industry Association

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 05 November 2025

    A website for the Stove Industry Association made unsubstantiated claims that modern stoves emitted significantly lower emissions than open fireplaces or older stoves, and that they were a low-emission way to heat a home. It also failed to make the basis of comparative environmental claims clear. 

  • persons unknown t/a Arthur Mystery Book

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 05 November 2025

    An in-game ad for a mobile game app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence by objectifying and sexualising women and featuring a harmful gender stereotype. 

  • HW Fantasy Ltd t/a My Passion

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 15 October 2025

    An in-game ad for an online romantic novel service, seen in a puzzle game was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence, including by trivialising violence against women.

  • Procter & Gamble UK t/a Ariel

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 15 October 2025

    A TV ad for Ariel laundry pods made an unsubstantiated claim that their product was as effective at cleaning clothes as other products, or when used in combination with laundry additives, and made unverifiable comparisons with identifiable competitors.

  • Hammonds Furniture Ltd t/a Hammonds

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 08 October 2025

    A banner ad and a page on the Hammonds Furniture website, misleadingly implied that discount offers were time limited and also made unsubstantiated and unverifiable comparative claims with identifiable competitors.

  • Gorgeous Shard Puzzle Studio

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 17 September 2025

    An in-game ad for a mobile game app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence, including by objectifying and sexualising women and featuring a harmful gender stereotype.

  • CTW Inc

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 27 August 2025

    Three paid-for YouTube ads for a video-game company were socially irresponsible, likely to cause serious or widespread offence and featured harmful gender stereotypes by objectifying and sexualising women. The ads also portrayed someone who appeared to be under 18 in a sexual way.

  • Colgate-Palmolive (UK) Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 20 August 2025

    A TV ad for Sanex shower gel was likely to cause serious offence by featuring a racial stereotype.

  • BrewDog plc

    • Upheld
    • Poster
    • 06 August 2025

    A poster broke the strict alcohol advertising rules because it implied that alcohol could overcome boredom, loneliness or other problems.

  • Inkitt GmbH t/a Inkitt

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 06 August 2025

    An in-app ad was not appropriately targeted and contained scenes that condoned sexually violent behaviour and were likely to cause serious and widespread offence.

  • Pheon Inc

    • Upheld
    • In-game advertising, Social media (paid ad)
    • 06 August 2025

    An in-game ad and a paid-for social media ad for an AI Chat Bot, portrayed the character as under-18 and was likely to cause serious or widespread offence by stereotyping women as sexual objects.

  • Glamour Shots

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 09 July 2025

    A paid-for Google search ad for eBay was irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence by objectifying and sexualising women.