Rulings (38)
  • Guangzhou Shimo Culture Media Co Ltd

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 11 December 2024

    An in-game ad was irresponsibly targeted, socially irresponsible and caused serious offense by featuring a harmful stereotype by objectifying and sexualising women.

  • Jaded London Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 11 December 2024

    An Instagram post was socially irresponsible and caused serious offense by featuring a harmful stereotype by objectifying and sexualising women.

  • Metamind AI Ltd t/a AI Persona

    • Upheld
    • In-game advertising
    • 11 December 2024

    An in-game ad was socially irresponsible, caused offense by harmfully stereotyping women as sexual objects and portrayed someone who seemed to be under-18 in a sexual way.

  • get_0ut_0f_debt Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 11 December 2024

    A video on the get_0ut_0f_debt TikTok account was irresponsible and caused serious offense and unjustified distress.

  • Bodystreet Franchise (UK) Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 04 December 2024

    A paid-for Instagram ad for a fitness centre made misleading claims that a 20-minute session per week was equivalent to three one-hour sessions at a regular gym.

  • Fern Brady

    • Upheld
    • Website (paid ad)
    • 20 November 2024

    A paid-for ad for the comedian Fern Brady, seen on the Sky News website, was likely to cause serious offence to some within the Christian faith.

  • Great Grass MCR Ltd t/a Great Grass

    • Upheld
    • 13 November 2024

    A poster was socially irresponsible and caused serious or widespread offence by featuring a harmful gender stereotype and objectifying women.  

  • W8 Tech Cyprus Ltd t/a Seeking

    • Upheld
    • 16 October 2024

    A paid-for Reddit ad for a dating website perpetuated sexist and negative gender stereotypes and was likely to cause harm and widespread offence.

  • 247 Home Furnishings Ltd t/a 247Blinds

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 04 September 2024

    A website ad which made references to blindness were likely to cause serious or widespread offence on the grounds of disability.

  • JD Sports Fashion plc

    • Upheld in part
    • Internet
    • 28 August 2024

     A Facebook page, a Facebook reel, a paid-for Facebook post and a poster condoned irresponsible, unsafe driving, but didn’t irresponsibly feature riders not wearing protective gear.

  • LC International Ltd t/a Coral

    • Not upheld
    • Digital outdoor
    • 31 July 2024

    A mobile digital billboard ad for Coral was not inappropriately placed.

  • Electronic Arts Ltd t/a EA

    • Upheld
    • 10 July 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a mobile app game did not make it sufficiently clear that the game contained loot boxes.

  • Online Classifieds AG t/a PURE

    • Upheld
    • 12 June 2024

    Two posters for the PURE Dating App, seen in March 2024: a. The poster depicted four images of cartoon style heads, next to text that stated, “IT’S A GOOD DAY TO GET SOME HEAD” and “ON PURE DATING APP” followed by a QR code. b. The poster depicted a cartoon head of a princess, next t...

  • Alzheimer's Society

    • Not Upheld
    • 05 June 2024

    Three TV ads and a radio ad for a charity were not irresponsible, did not cause serious or widespread offence, and did not cause unjustifiable distress.

  • Top Games Inc

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 03 April 2024

    A paid-for X ad for the game Evony: The King’s Return featured gameplay that was not representative of the actual game.

  • John Mills Ltd t/a JML Direct

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 27 March 2024

    A TV ad for a cleaning tool presented gender stereotypes in a way that was likely to cause harm.

  • DUSK (Retail) Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 20 March 2024

    A TV ad was not likely to cause serious or widespread offence over its portrayal of men.

  • Electronic Arts Ltd t/a EA

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 20 March 2024

    Two paid-for Facebook ads for Golf Clash, a mobile app game, omitted material information about the inclusion of loot boxes.

  • Hing Fo International Ltd t/a ALFABAR

    • Upheld in part
    • Poster
    • 20 March 2024

    A poster for an electronic cigarettes brand was irresponsible for being likely to appeal particularly to under-18s, but was not inappropriately targeted. 

  • Jagex Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 20 March 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad for online game RuneScape omitted material information about the inclusion of loot boxes.

Informally resolved (7)
  • Build Hollywood Ltd

    • 07 August 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Media: Other
    Topic: Charity, education and Third sector

  • G.Network Communications Ltd

    • 07 August 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Media: Internet
    Topic: Sports, leisure and hobbies

  • Kentucky Fried Chicken (Great Britain) Ltd t/a KFC

    • 24 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Food, drink and supplements

  • Veblen Wines Ltd

    • 24 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Alcohol

  • Dolphin Fitness Ltd

    • 12 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Sports, leisure and hobbies

  • Ello Group Ltd t/a Coffee Club

    • 12 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Food, drink and supplements

  • Lumi Skn Ltd

    • 12 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Medical devices