Rulings (47)
  • salesforce UK Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • VOD
    • 06 October 2021

    A Video on Demand (VOD) ad for Salesforce was not likely to cause serious or widespread offence.

  • Telefonica UK Ltd t/a O2

    • Upheld
    • Newspaper
    • 22 September 2021

    A newspaper ad for O2 was banned for making misleading comparative claims against their competitors.

  • Cheshire Health & Medical Professionals LLP

    • Upheld
    • Magazine
    • 15 September 2021

    We banned an ad for a medical device claiming over misleading efficacy claims around pain relief.

  • Banter Group Ltd t/a BanterKing

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 08 September 2021

    A paid-for display ad for an online novelty goods retailer which appeared in the Sky Sports app was banned for being likely to cause serious or widespread offence.

  • International Footcare Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 01 September 2021

    We did not uphold complaints that an ad for a shoe was sexist.

  • Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board t/a AHDB

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Television, VOD
    • 18 August 2021

    We did not uphold complaints regarding ads encouraging meat consumption.

  • Kendal Nutricare Ltd t/a Kendamil

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 04 August 2021

    An ad for baby formula was banned over health and nutrition claims.

  • Mondelez Europe Services GmbH

    • Not upheld
    • Internet (website content), Social media (own site)
    • 04 August 2021

    An ad for a limited edition beer was not banned.

  • Turner Broadcasting System Europe Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 04 August 2021

    A TV ad for life insurance was banned for inappropriate scheduling against children’s programming.

  • Vodafone Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Newspaper, Internet (website content)
    • 28 July 2021

    A website and newspaper ad for Vodafone were banned for claiming to be the “UK’s best mobile data network” without having adequate proof to substantiate the claim.

  • Cignpost Diagnostics Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Newspaper
    • 21 July 2021

    A newspaper ad for a PCR testing programme was banned for promoting behaviour that contradicted government advice on social distancing.

  • Actegy Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 14 July 2021

    A newspaper ad for an Aerosure device was banned for misleadingly stating that it was clinically proven to reduce coughing and a tight chest associated with a shortness of breath.

  • BMW (UK) Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Radio
    • 14 July 2021

    A radio ad for BMW was banned for demonstrating the power of a car in a way that suggested excitement and not in the clear context of safety.

  • Rustin and Mallory Wholesale Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 14 July 2021

    Two paid-for Facebook ads were banned as the models appeared to be unhealthily thin.

  • Crimestoppers Trust

    • Not upheld
    • Radio
    • 07 July 2021

    Two radio ads for the charity CrimeStoppers were not scheduled inappropriately and did not break the BCAP Code.

  • Au Vodka Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 30 June 2021

    Seven Instagram and a website post for a vodka company were banned for encouraging excessive drinking, for linking the consumption of alcohol with driving, and for featuring a rapper who under 25 years of age.

  • Person(s) unknown t/a KaiAviation

    • Upheld
    • Magazine (paid ad)
    • 23 June 2021

    A magazine ad for a clothing company was banned for being likely to cause serious or widespread offence by objectifying women.

  • John Mills Ltd t/a JML Direct

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 09 June 2021

    A TV ad for a Hurricane Spin Scrubber was banned for suggesting that cleaning the home was a responsibility uniquely associated with women.

  • Kentucky Fried Chicken (Great Britain) Ltd t/a KFC

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 09 June 2021

    A TV ad for KFC did not perpetuate negative ethnic stereotypes and was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence.

  • Tesco Stores Ltd t/a Tesco

    • Not upheld
    • Newspaper
    • 09 June 2021

    A newspaper ad for Tesco did not make misleading price comparison claims and did not break the CAP Code.