Rulings (58)
  • Betway Ltd t/a Betway

    • Not Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 27 May 2026

    An Instagram post for Betway featuring Thierry Henry wasn’t likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s. 

  • Cyan Blue Odds Ltd t/a Oddschecker

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 27 May 2026

    Two Instagram posts for an online betting platform featuring Harry Kane and Erling Haaland were likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s. 

  • Birling Shore Ltd t/a ShroomIQ

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)
    • 22 April 2026

    A website and paid-for Facebook ad for a children’s supplement brand stated that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure the symptoms of ADHD, Tourette Syndrome, anxiety and depression. The ads also made medicinal claims for unauthorised products, made unauthorised health claims&nb...

  • Skill on Net Ltd t/a Gecko Play

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 08 April 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for a gambling website portrayed, condoned and encouraged gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible and could lead to financial, social or emotional harm.

  • Sazerac UK Ltd t/a Hi-Spirits

    • Upheld
    • Poster
    • 01 April 2026

    A poster for an alcoholic drink was socially irresponsible by encouraging excessive drinking.

  • Eastern Savings and Loans Credit Union

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 March 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a credit union irresponsibly encouraged the purchase of non-essential items through the use of credit, particularly in relation to funding Black Friday and Christmas purchases.

  • Humantra UK Operations Ltd t/a Humantra

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 March 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for electrolyte sachets broke rules prohibit claims that state or imply a food can prevent, treat or cure human disease. 

  • Riverside Credit Union Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 March 2026

    A paid-for Facebook post for a credit union irresponsibly encouraged excessive spending through the use of credit, particularly in relation to funding non-essential Christmas purchases.

  • Saeta Tech Ltd t/a PixVideo – AI Video Maker

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 March 2026

    A paid-for YouTube ad for an AI video maker which condoned digitally altering and exposing women’s bodies without their consent, was irresponsible, included a harmful gender stereotype and was likely to cause serious offence.

  • Smart Money Cymru Community Bank

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 March 2026

    A paid-for Facebook post for a credit union irresponsibly encouraged excessive spending through the use of credit, particularly in relation to Christmas.

  • TFS Buying Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 March 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a buy now pay later arrangement irresponsibly encouraged non-essential spending through the use of credit, particularly in relation to funding non-essential Christmas purchases.

  • persons unknown t/a Evora Official

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 25 February 2026

    Four paid-for Facebook ads and a website for a multi-sensory stuffed toy made unlicenced medicinal claims that weren’t backed up by robust evidence, including that the product could relieve symptoms of anxiety and insomnia. The ads also made misleading claims about testimonials and didn’t have evidence to s...

  • Activision Blizzard UK Ltd t/a Call of Duty

    • Upheld in part
    • Social media (paid ad), Video on demand
    • 18 February 2026

    A Video on Demand and YouTube ad for Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence by trivialising sexual violence. Another issue was investigated but it didn’t break the rules.

  • FlyDogGame t/a Love and Peace

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 18 February 2026

    A paid-for ad for a mobile game app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by trivialising and condoning violence, including domestic violence.

  • Pocket FM Private Ltd

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 18 February 2026

    A paid-for in-app ad for an audiobook app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by referencing sexual assault and sexual violence.

  • Skywork AI Pte t/a Dramawave

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 18 February 2026

    A video ad for a streaming platform was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by featuring content that was sexually explicit and suggested sexual violence.

  • Transport For London t/a TFL

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 February 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for Transport for London was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence on the grounds of race by reinforcing a negative stereotype about black men.

  • Haikou Chengfa Technology Co Ltd t/a Aurai Ai

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 11 February 2026

    A paid-for YouTube ad for an AI role play app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence, including by featuring expletives and content that condoned sexually violent behaviour.

  • The Walt Disney Company Ltd t/a Twentieth Century Studios

    • Upheld
    • Poster (digital video)
    • 11 February 2026

    An outdoor digital video poster for the film Predator Badlands was likely to cause fear and distress for young children and was displayed in a place where it could be seen by people of all ages.

  • persons unknown t/a Animals Solitaire: Protect

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 04 February 2026

    An in-game ad for a mobile game app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by objectifying and sexualising women and featuring a harmful gender stereotype.