-
Beware of no win, no fee claims
ordered almost £1m to be paid out to resolve disputes where a consumer has received poor legal services for a ‘no win, no fee’ claim.
services for a ‘no win, no fee’ claim. These types of claims are usually made when a . While ‘no win, no fee’ arrangements are useful in helping people get access to justice number of ads where the advertiser has failed to make clear and upfront where a no win no fee claim
-
Litigation: Claims management
: Financial Products and Services, Will Writers, Litigation: No Win, No Fee Claims, Litigation: Specious claims.
-
Litigation: Specious claims
claims (CMCOB 3.2.8) and "No Win, No Fee" agreements (CMCOB 3.2.9).. Ads for these agreements
-
Turner Lewis Ltd
Child Trust Fund and, guess what? It’s a no-win, no-fee basis, meaning you’ve got nothing on a no win, no fee basis. Our fee is 25% plus VAT of the total amount in the account”. Smaller text
intended to highlight that their service was offered on a “no win, no fee” basis. If they said ad (a) specifically stated that their service was provided on a “no win, no fee” basis the claim “It’s a no-win, no-fee basis, meaning you’ve got nothing to lose
-
Jones Whyte Law Ltd t/a Jones Whyte
group action claims on a no win, no fee basis. No upfront costs to you.” Further text stated “Why Choose Us? No upfront costs, No win, no fee, Thousands already involved&rdquo ’t heard directly from Arnold Clark, you can still join our group action claims on a no win
the language in the ads was clear and unambiguous and that the claims “no win no fee” and . “No win no fee” was intended to indicate to consumers that a fee would be payable if you” and “no win, no fee” were repeated three times in the Facebook ad (a). The ASA
-
JLG Legal Ltd t/a Johnson Law Group
to check. Do You Qualify? Verify using your Reg # No Upfront Cost. No Win No Fee. Free Evaluation.&rdquo to the question “How much do we charge?” stated “We operate under a No Win No Fee Agreement, meaning at the Johnson Law Group a fully insured ‘No Win No Fee’ arrangement which means
“no win no fee” was ubiquitous as the consumer-facing, simple term to describe conditional fee . The nature of no-win no-fee litigation was such that, because the fee the client paid was entirely because there were many financial variables that could apply to a no-win no-fee agreement. For example
-
KP Law Ltd
if you could join a no-win, no-fee Arnold Clark data breach claim. It will only take a few minutes answered yes to any of the above, you could have a NO-WIN, NO-FEE Arnold Clark compensation claim
“no win no fee” was not overly prominent and it was not used excessively. They did not consider before they signed up. “No win no fee” was commonly used in ads. In the context of ‘no-win, no-fee’ phrase already implied that if the claim was successful there may be
-
Versus Law Ltd
to ads (a), (b) and (c) only We understood that Flight Delay Claim operated on a “no win, no fee” basis
Search
If you need help finding a particular page or resource on our website, please see our tips for searching on the ASA website.
8 result(s)

