9 result(s)

Active filters

  • Ruling
  • Menar Jimmy Georgiou

    • Ruling
    • Upheld
    • 21 June 2023

    for the following treatments … Botox … B12 Injections”.

    medical treatments may not be advertised to the public. Botox and B12 injections were POMs. The ad … stated, “Models wanted for the following treatments … Botox … B12 Injections

  • Glowery Ltd t/a Glowday

    • Ruling
    • Upheld
    • 12 April 2023

    2022. One page featured an image of four women together and text “The best Botox in London … ”. Beneath that, text stated “We only feature the best Botox practitioners near you who we … and answer section and a treatment guide to Botox. A second page, titled “Back to School Botox

    complainant challenged whether the ads breached the Code because it advertised Botox, a prescription … -only medicine (POM). 2. The ASA challenged whether the “Back To School Botox” page … and aesthetic treatments. Consumers were not able to purchase Botox or any other prescription-only

  • Egemed Hastaneleri

    • Ruling
    • Upheld
    • 10 May 2023

    emoji] Summer sale [parasol emoji] [present emoji] 3-zone facial botox [...] Transactions included … , A World-Class Hospital, Perfect Service” and underneath appeared a graphic of a gift box with text stating “3 Zone Facial BOTOX” next to it.

    3. the ad breached the Code because it advertised Botox, a prescription only medicine. The … ”, a promotion which offered “3 zone facial BOTOX” as a free gift, with no indication of a … (POM) must not be advertised to the public. We understood that Botox was a POM. The ad featured two

  • TJC & BLC Aesthetics Clinic & Training Academy

    • Ruling
    • Upheld
    • 08 November 2023

    […] Foundation Botox […] Vitamin b12 [sic] injections […] Anatomy &

  • Secret Surgery Ltd

    • Ruling
    • Upheld
    • 13 July 2022

    “I want to … tell you about the national shortage of … Botox. Now, with immediate

    ASA challenged whether the ads were irresponsible because by claiming there was a shortage of Botox … to the public. The ASA understood that Botox was a POM. The ads invited readers to book Botox … advertising of Botox treatment to the general public was prohibited, we also assessed whether the ads

  • LIFT Aesthetics t/a lift.aesthetics

    • Ruling
    • Upheld
    • 17 May 2023

    . LIFT Aesthetics confirmed that Mr Woods did not pay for the Botox treatment featured in the ads … stated that they were aware that it was a breach of the CAP Code to refer to Botox in marketing … free Botox treatment constituted a payment to Mr Woods. We then assessed the degree of control LIFT

  • Valterous Ltd t/a Therapie Clinic

    • Ruling
    • Upheld
    • 18 December 2024

    Clinics UK. They challenged whether the ads promoted Botox, and therefore breached the Code by … , dermal filler and lip filler were non-POM treatments, botulinum toxin (Botox) was a POM. The ad stated … , namely Botox. We therefore concluded that the ad advertised a POM to the general public. The ad

  • Dr Bunny Aesthetics

    • Ruling
    • Upheld
    • 24 April 2024

    within the ad were indirect references to Botox, that had the same effect as promoting a POM

  • My Perfect Cosmetics Company Ltd

    • Ruling
    • Not upheld
    • 09 March 2022

    The complainant, who believed that Penny Lane had used Botox, challenged whether the ad