Active filters
-
Menar Jimmy Georgiou
for the following treatments … Botox … B12 Injections”.
medical treatments may not be advertised to the public. Botox and B12 injections were POMs. The ad stated, “Models wanted for the following treatments … Botox … B12 Injections
-
Glowery Ltd t/a Glowday
2022. One page featured an image of four women together and text “The best Botox in London ”. Beneath that, text stated “We only feature the best Botox practitioners near you who we and answer section and a treatment guide to Botox. A second page, titled “Back to School Botox
complainant challenged whether the ads breached the Code because it advertised Botox, a prescription -only medicine (POM). 2. The ASA challenged whether the “Back To School Botox” page and aesthetic treatments. Consumers were not able to purchase Botox or any other prescription-only
-
Egemed Hastaneleri
emoji] Summer sale [parasol emoji] [present emoji] 3-zone facial botox [...] Transactions included , A World-Class Hospital, Perfect Service” and underneath appeared a graphic of a gift box with text stating “3 Zone Facial BOTOX” next to it.
3. the ad breached the Code because it advertised Botox, a prescription only medicine. The ”, a promotion which offered “3 zone facial BOTOX” as a free gift, with no indication of a (POM) must not be advertised to the public. We understood that Botox was a POM. The ad featured two
-
TJC & BLC Aesthetics Clinic & Training Academy
[…] Foundation Botox […] Vitamin b12 [sic] injections […] Anatomy &
-
Secret Surgery Ltd
“I want to … tell you about the national shortage of … Botox. Now, with immediate
ASA challenged whether the ads were irresponsible because by claiming there was a shortage of Botox to the public. The ASA understood that Botox was a POM. The ads invited readers to book Botox advertising of Botox treatment to the general public was prohibited, we also assessed whether the ads
-
LIFT Aesthetics t/a lift.aesthetics
. LIFT Aesthetics confirmed that Mr Woods did not pay for the Botox treatment featured in the ads stated that they were aware that it was a breach of the CAP Code to refer to Botox in marketing free Botox treatment constituted a payment to Mr Woods. We then assessed the degree of control LIFT
-
Valterous Ltd t/a Therapie Clinic
Clinics UK. They challenged whether the ads promoted Botox, and therefore breached the Code by , dermal filler and lip filler were non-POM treatments, botulinum toxin (Botox) was a POM. The ad stated , namely Botox. We therefore concluded that the ad advertised a POM to the general public. The ad
-
Dr Bunny Aesthetics
within the ad were indirect references to Botox, that had the same effect as promoting a POM
-
My Perfect Cosmetics Company Ltd
The complainant, who believed that Penny Lane had used Botox, challenged whether the ad