Rulings (6)

  • AirDoctor LLC t/a AmazingAir

    • Upheld
    • 28 May 2025

    A post on the health.detective Garstang Health Food Store’s TikTok account wasn't obviously identifiable as an ad and made medical claims for an unlicensed product.

  • Neilson Financial Services Ltd t/a British Seniors

    • Not upheld
    • 28 May 2025

    A TV ad didn't show an infant in an unsafe sleep position.   

  • Turner Lewis Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Social media (own site)
    • 28 May 2025

    A TikTok post and a website misled people about the nature of their business, omitted material information, took advantage of people's inexperience and credulity and failed to be upfront about significant qualifications. 

  • UAB Convenity t/a Huusk

    • Upheld
    • 28 May 2025

    A TV ad for Huusk Knives was irresponsibly scheduled. 

  • Viva Research Ltd t/a Vivanmn

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 28 May 2025

    Two paid-for Facebook ads claimed that a food supplement could treat or cure ADHD, made medicinal claims for an unlicensed product and made unauthorised specific health claims. 

  • air up GmbH

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 28 May 2025

    A paid-for TikTok ad was irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offense.

Informally resolved (8)

  • AO Mobile Ltd

    • 28 May 2025
    • Number of complaints: 1

  • Bella Bathrooms Ltd

    • 28 May 2025
    • Number of complaints: 1

  • Chattermill Analytics Ltd

    • 28 May 2025
    • Number of complaints: 1

  • John Lewis plc

    • 28 May 2025
    • Number of complaints: 1

  • Octopus Energy Ltd

    • 28 May 2025
    • Number of complaints: 1

  • StudySmarter GmbH

    • 28 May 2025
    • Number of complaints: 1

  • Traffic Label Ltd

    • 28 May 2025
    • Number of complaints: 1

  • Vodafone Ltd

    • 28 May 2025
    • Number of complaints: 1

Mail order cases (0)
Database cases (0)