Rulings (5)
  • Bodystreet Franchise (UK) Ltd t/a Bodystreet

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 25 June 2025

    A website made unsubstantiated claims that 20 minutes of exercise at their studio was enough for a week, that Electro Muscle Stimulation (EMS) training would lead to a reduction in body fat in a short time and that they were Europe's leading provider of EMS training.

  • Guardian News and Media Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 25 June 2025

    A pop-up banner ad was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence and wasn’t irresponsibly targeted.

  • HOMA Games SAS

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 25 June 2025

    An in-game ad was socially irresponsible and caused serious or widespread offence, including by featuring a harmful stereotype by objectifying women.

  • Honeytech Ltd t/a Honeytoon

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 25 June 2025

    Two paid-for X ads were socially irresponsible, featured harmful gender stereotypes and caused serious or widespread offence, including referencing incest, featuring scenes that depicted women as objects of sexual gratification and trivialising sexual assault.

  • SaffPro

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Social media (own site)
    • 25 June 2025

    A TikTok post and a paid-for Facebook ad made unauthorised specific health claims, claimed that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure ADHD and irresponsibly encouraged people to stop taking medically prescribed treatments for ADHD.