Rulings (214)
  • Ambassador Cruise Holidays Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 27 August 2025

    An email advertising offers on cruises made misleading savings claims.

  • Contact Solar Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 27 August 2025

    A paid-for Bing search ad for a solar panel installation company made unsubstantiated price claims and omitted material information that was likely to affect consumers’ understanding of the price claim.

  • Formulapower/fuelcat Ltd t/a Fuel Cat

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 27 August 2025

    A website for a company selling fuel catalysts made unsubstantiated claims that their products could improve engine efficiency.

  • Team RH Fitness Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 27 August 2025

    A webpage advertising a health and fitness app was misleading as it failed to make clear that a subscription had a minimum commitment period of a 12-months.

  • Trainline.com Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Video on demand, Radio
    • 27 August 2025

    A Video on Demand ad and a radio ad for Trainline made misleading and unsubstantiated claims that they offered the cheapest ticket prices.

  • Lloyds Bank plc t/a Lloyds Banking Group (LBG)

    • Upheld
    • National newspaper (paid ad)
    • 20 August 2025

    A national press ad for Lloyds Bank misleadingly implied that they had made donations to social housing projects and omitted significant information that put these claims into context.

  • Thomas Keith Ltd t/a Thomas Keith Independent School

    • Upheld
    • 13 August 2025

    A paid-for Google ad made misleading claims about the location and ranking of a school.

  • uSwitch Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • 13 August 2025

    A marketing email did not mislead consumers about an exclusive offer to switch gas suppliers.

  • Actegy Ltd

    • Upheld in part
    • Television
    • 06 August 2025

    A TV ad for ‘Revitive Circulation Booster’, a Neuromuscular electrical stimulation device, claiming it could reduce swelling did not make clear this was only in relation to healthy people and was a temporary result. It also made misleading claims the device could improve walking distance and duration for th...

  • Aira Home UK Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 06 August 2025

    A paid-for Meta ad for heat pump installation omitted material information about the eligibility criteria for government funding available for installing the pumps.

  • Amazon Europe Core Sarl t/a Amazon.co.uk

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 06 August 2025

    A webpage on Amazon.co.uk showed unclear options to purchase Amazon Prime and was misleading for consumers.

  • Arrae Inc

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 06 August 2025

    Two paid-for Meta ads for food supplements made unauthorised and misleading medical and health claims for weight loss.

  • Cheeky Baby Products Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 06 August 2025

    A blog post misleadingly implied that reusable nappies could help earlier toilet training.

  • EDF Energy Ltd t/a EDF

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 06 August 2025

    A paid-for Google ad for heat pump installation omitted material information about the eligibility criteria for government funding available for installing the pumps.

  • Energystore Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Local or regional newspaper (paid ad)
    • 06 August 2025

    A local press ad for a loft and wall cavity insulation installation company was misleading because it omitted material information about the government funding available for installing insulation products.

  • Inkitt GmbH t/a Inkitt

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 06 August 2025

    An in-app ad was not appropriately targeted and contained scenes that condoned sexually violent behaviour and were likely to cause serious and widespread offence.

  • Myota GmbH

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 06 August 2025

    Two paid-for Facebook ads for food supplements made unauthorised and misleading medical and health claims for weight loss.

  • Ovira Australia t/a Ovira UK

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 06 August 2025

    Two paid-for Meta ads for food supplements made unauthorised and misleading medical and health claims for weight loss.

  • Ovo Energy Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 06 August 2025

    A paid-for Meta ad for insulation installation did not make misleading price claims and included material information about a government grant, including eligibility criteria.

  • The Clean Supps LLC t/a Inno Supps

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 06 August 2025

    Two paid-for Meta ads for food supplements made unauthorised and misleading medical and health claims for weight loss.

Informally resolved (1)
  • Toolport GmbH t/a House of Tents

    • 06 November 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Home and garden