Rulings (291)
  • Cablelinker Electronics Ltd t/a Aquoxis

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 01 July 2026

    A YouTube pre-roll ad and two online display ads for a pressure washer misleadingly exaggerated the functionality of the product.

  • Paramount Pictures UK

    • Not Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 01 July 2026

    A pre-roll YouTube ad wasn’t likely to cause serious or widespread offence.

  • Singapore New Reading Technology Pte Ltd t/a GoodNovel

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 01 July 2026

    An in-game ad for an online reading platform was socially irresponsible, condoned violence, included harmful gender stereotypes and was likely to cause harm or serious and widespread offence.

  • Videoslots Ltd t/a Mr Vegas

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 01 July 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a gambling company featured imagery that was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

  • YN Netcom Ltd t/a BeeHome

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 01 July 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a cordless pressure washer misleadingly exaggerated the functionality of the product and claimed they had a high rating based on customer reviews when this was not the case.

  • Adidas UK Ltd t/a adidas

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 24 June 2026

    A paid-for Google ad for adidas made misleading environmental claims.

  • Argos Limited t/a Argos

    • Upheld in part
    • Magazine (commercial classified)
    • 24 June 2026

    A page in the Argos 2025 Christmas gift guide featuring the video game Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 failed to make clear that the game contained loot boxes. Another ad was investigated but it didn’t break the rules. 

  • Calvin Klein Europe BV t/a Calvin Klein

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 24 June 2026

    A paid-for Google ad for Calvin Klein made misleading environmental claims.

  • Express Healthcare Ltd t/a pharmacyonline.co.uk

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 24 June 2026

    A paid-for Meta ad and website for an online pharmacy promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules. 

  • Microsoft Ltd t/a Microsoft

    • Upheld
    • Poster (digital static image)
    • 24 June 2026

    Two digital posters for the Xbox Game Pass failed to make clear that the games shown in the posters included in game purchases. 

  • Motorpoint Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 24 June 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for a used car retailer made misleading savings claims. 

  • Patisserie Valerie Production Ltd t/a Patisserie Valerie

    • Not upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 24 June 2026

    Three paid-for Google search ads for Patisserie Valerie didn’t break the less healthy food rules as they were a small or medium sized enterprise and therefore were exempt from the restrictions. 

  • Revolut Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 24 June 2026

    A webpage on Revolut’s website wasn’t misleading. 

  • The Clean Supps LLC t/a Inno Supps

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 24 June 2026

    Four paid-for Meta ads promoting supplements made claims that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure human diseases or conditions, made unauthorised health claims and made claims that referred to a rate or amount of weight loss for food supplements. The ad also used ...

  • Uniqlo (UK) Ltd t/a UNIQLO

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 24 June 2026

    A paid- for Google ad for UNIQLO made misleading environmental claims.   

  • Wrappiness UK

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 24 June 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for an online décor and gift retailer was likely to cause serious and widespread offence including by using explicit language and sexual references.   

  • HealthTracker Apps t/a Blood Pressure Monitor App

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 17 June 2026

    Two paid-for in-app ads for a health app made medical claims for a product that wasn’t registered as a medical device and misleadingly implied that their app could monitor blood pressure and heart rate.

  • Hume Health LLC t/a HumeHealth

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 17 June 2026

    Three paid-for YouTube ads and a paid-for Facebook ad for Hume Health made medical claims for products that weren’t registered as medical devices, discouraged essential treatment for conditions for which medical supervision should be sought and exaggerated the capabilities of their products.

  • MN2S Management Ltd t/a MN2S

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 17 June 2026

    A website for a talent agency misleadingly stated that Seph Lawless was represented by the agency and was available to be booked through them.

  • Novabeyond Ltd t/a Blood Pressure-Monitor Tracker App

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 17 June 2026

    An in-app ad and a paid-for Google ad for a health app made medical claims for a product that wasn’t registered as a medical device and made misleading claims that their product could monitor blood pressure.