Rulings (43)
  • Shop TJC Ltd t/a Ideal World

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 12 March 2025

    A teleshopping presentation made unsubstantiated price and savings claims. 

  • Gemporia Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 05 March 2025

    A teleshopping presentation misleadingly compared the price of a product to the price of a non-identical competitor product and failed to substantiate price statements.

  • Intelligent Lending Ltd t/a Ocean

    • Upheld
    • 19 February 2025

    A paid-for Meta ad and display ad irresponsibly encouraged consumers to spend regularly on non-essential purchases using a credit card.

  • Meggan Kirkland

    • Upheld
    • 19 February 2025

    A promotion on Meggan Kirkland’s Instagram account wasn’t administered fairly.

  • Connect UK Sales Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 12 February 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad and website landing page didn’t make clear that the value of investments was variable and failed to provide evidence to substantiate investment claims and price comparisons.

  • Family Vision Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 12 February 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad irresponsibly encouraged the use of credit agreements to fund Christmas spending.

  • Land Profits EDU Ltd t/a Land Profits

    • Upheld
    • 12 February 2025

    Two paid-for Facebook posts and a website didn’t make clear that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future and also failed to substantiate objective claims.

  • Luxury Lodge Estates Company Ltd t/a Luxury Lodges

    • Upheld
    • 12 February 2025

    A magazine ad didn’t make clear that the value of investments was variable, and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future. It also failed to make the nature of a guarantee clear and didn’t include non-optional fees.

  • SteadyPay Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 12 February 2025

    A paid-for Meta ad irresponsibly encouraged people to borrow money for the Black Friday sales and to spend more than they could afford.

  • Zimran Ltd t/a Prosperi Academy

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Internet (video)
    • 15 January 2025

    A paid-for YouTube ad for an app offering financial investment training courses didn't make clear that the value of investments was variable and irresponsibly took advantage of people's lack of experience by implying that investment was straightforward and that large returns could be made with minimal time and ...

  • Wahed Invest Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Poster
    • 08 January 2025

    Six posters which appeared on the TfL network caused serious offence by featuring images of burning US dollar and Euro banknotes.

  • Beer52 Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 18 December 2024

    Two email promotions omitted significant conditions.

  • IT Career Change Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet
    • 18 December 2024

    A listing on a job vacancy website misleadingly implied they were offering genuine job vacancies.

  • Origin Sleep UK Ltd t/a Origin Mattress

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 18 December 2024

    A website implied that a promotion was time limited when this wasn’t the case, made misleading and unsubstantiated savings claims and made unsubstantiated claims about the health properties of their products.

  • get_0ut_0f_debt Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 11 December 2024

    A video on the get_0ut_0f_debt TikTok account was irresponsible and caused serious offense and unjustified distress.

  • Churchill Retirement Living Ltd

    • Upheld
    • National newspaper (paid ad)
    • 04 December 2024

    A national newspaper ad failed to include the significant conditions of a promotion, including a closing date.

  • Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 27 November 2024

    A website promotion misleadingly described a promotional item as “free”, did not make clear promotional items would have to be purchased upfront before being redeemed via a cashback mechanism and omitted significant conditions.

  • Aurum & Argenti Ltd t/a Bullion Club, bullionclub.co.uk

    • Upheld
    • Website (paid ad)
    • 20 November 2024

    A paid-for Google ad failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future.

  • Gold Warehouse Ltd t/a Gold Bank

    • Upheld
    • Radio
    • 20 November 2024

    Three radio ads, which implied that gold had investment potential, were broadcast on a non-specialist radio channel.

  • Gold Warehouse Ltd t/a Gold Bank

    • Upheld
    • Press other (paid ad)
    • 20 November 2024

    A press ad failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.

Informally resolved (3)
  • House of Fraser Ltd

    • 17 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Media: Email
    Topic: Pricing and charges

  • Benefex Ltd

    • 12 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Promotions and competitions

  • Ellis Hay t/a Ellis Hay

    • 12 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Property sales and lettings