Rulings (40)
  • Manchestersalerent.co.uk

    • Upheld
    • Internet (on own site)
    • 20 January 2021

    A house listing on an estate agent’s website was banned as the property was no longer available for purchase.

  • OverStreet.co.uk

    • Upheld
    • Internet (on own site)
    • 20 January 2021

    A house listing on an estate agent’s website was banned as the property was no longer available for purchase.

  • In The Style Fashion Ltd t/a In the Style

    • Upheld
    • Internet
    • 06 January 2021

    A website and Instagram post by an online fashion retailer were banned for implying that all their products were included in an offer when this was not actually the case.

  • James Murray Solicitors

    • Not upheld
    • Radio
    • 06 January 2021

    A radio ad for a law film was not likely to cause unjustifiable distress and did not breach the BCAP Code.

  • Lidl Great Britain Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (on own site), National press, Leaflet
    • 16 December 2020

    Two leaflets, a website, and two newspaper ads for Lidl products were banned for quoting unsubstantiated RRP claims.

  • KS Competitions Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 02 December 2020

    A website ad promoting a competition to win hair products breached the CAP Code for not explaining the free entry route and for stating that its closing date would be extended if all tickets were not sold.

  • Rightio Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (sponsored search)
    • 25 November 2020

    A paid-for Google Ad for a plumbing service misleadingly stated that a call-out charge did not apply for diagnostic work carried out by engineers.

  • Rightmove Group Ltd t/a Rightmove

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 18 November 2020

    A TV ad did not depict gender stereotypes in a way that was likely to cause harm.

  • Omaze Inc

    • Upheld
    • 07 October 2020

    A website promotion for a house raffle competition did not clearly explain the free route entry.

  • The Trade Centre Group plc t/a The Trade Centre UK, The Trade Centre Wales

    • Upheld
    • 23 September 2020

    A radio ad for a used car dealer was banned for presenting the terms and conditions in an unclear and ambiguous manner.

  • Anglian Windows Ltd t/a Anglian Home Improvements

    • Upheld
    • Internet (on own site)
    • 05 August 2020

    A website ad for home appliances was banned for making misleading savings claims.

  • Online Tax Rebates Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 22 July 2020

    A website ad for tax rebate quotes did not misleadingly imply consumers could obtain an estimate before deciding whether to proceed with a claim.

  • BOXT Ltd

    • Upheld in part
    • Television, Social media (own site)
    • 15 July 2020

    A YouTube and TV ad for a BOXT boiler was banned for making misleading price comparison claims.

  • Telefonica UK Ltd t/a O2

    • Upheld
    • National press
    • 08 July 2020

    Two newspaper ads for O2 made misleading claims about the total cost of an iPad and Surface Pros.

  • Grapevine Europe Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 20 May 2020

    A TV ad for a car buying comparison site misled consumers about what personal information was needed to obtain valuations from their website.

  • Sky UK Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 13 May 2020

    A TV ad misleadingly implied Sky offered the UK’s lowest-priced superfast broadband.

  • Boohoo.com UK Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Email, Internet (social networking)
    • 06 May 2020

    Discount claims in an email and website misleadingly implied all products would be discounted and a countdown clock on the website misleadingly implied the offers were time-limited.

  • Clear Score Technology Ltd t/a ClearScore

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 06 May 2020

    A TV ad for a financial technology company did not make clear that pre-approved offers would be subject to additional checks by the lender prior to approval.

  • Hydro Solutions Fylde Ltd t/a Elite Competitions

    • Upheld
    • Internet (sales promotion)
    • 06 May 2020

    A website page for prize competitions was misleading because the free entry route was unclear, the closing date was extended without good reason and a prize of 70% of ticket sales was not a reasonable equivalent to the advertised prizes.

  • I Saw it First Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Text Message
    • 06 May 2020

    A text message and a website for an online fashion retailer misleadingly implied a promotion was applicable to all products and that, by using a countdown clock, discount offers were time-limited.