-
Locksley Distilling Co Ltd
A paid-for Facebook and Instagram ad for a bottle of gin implied that a drink may be preferred because of its higher alcohol content.
-
Team RH Fitness Ltd
A webpage advertising a health and fitness app was misleading as it failed to make clear that a subscription had a minimum commitment period of a 12-months.
-
BrewDog plc
A poster broke the strict alcohol advertising rules because it implied that alcohol could overcome boredom, loneliness or other problems.
-
Inkitt GmbH t/a Inkitt
An in-app ad was not appropriately targeted and contained scenes that condoned sexually violent behaviour and were likely to cause serious and widespread offence.
-
Detox Today
A website homepage for an alcohol addiction help and support service misleadingly implied that the advertiser directly provided registered medical treatment.
-
GreenPixel Ltd t/a Hotel Merge Empire
An in-game ad was likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by condoning domestic violence.
-
Phusion Projects LLC t/a FourLoko
An Instagram ad was socially irresponsible and encouraged people to adopt an unwise drinking style.
-
Groupon International Ltd
A website made misleading pricing and savings claims.
-
2XU UK Limited
A paid-for Instagram ad for 2xu Recovery Compression Tights made medical claims without holding the applicable conformity marking and were not registered with the MHRA.
-
Global Brands Ltd t/a VK
A paid-for Instagram story posted by @vkdrink was socially irresponsible by implying that drinking alcohol could overcome boredom.
-
The Innovative Brewing Company Ltd t/a Prime Time Lager
A poster ad for Prime Time Lager made health and nutrition claims not permitted for alcoholic drinks.
-
A3 Games Pte Ltd t/a Top Girl
A paid-for Facebook ad was socially irresponsible and caused serious or widespread offence, including by featuring a harmful gender stereotype by objectifying and sexualising women.
-
Bestway Retail Ltd t/a Bargain Booze
A paid-for Instagram and Facebook ad for alcohol which featured Father Christmas was of particular appeal to under-18s.
-
Wilton Bradley Ltd t/a Xootz
A TV ad and product page was misleading and socially irresponsible by failing to disclose that private e-scooters couldn’t be legally used in public places.
-
Astrasoft Projects Ltd t/a Sofiadate.com
A paid-for Facebook ad featured harmful stereotypes likely to cause serious or widespread offence.
-
Banquist Ltd t/a Winedrops
A paid-for Facebook ad and sponsored Instagram story made unsubstantiated price comparison claims and misleadingly implied that reviews and ratings were from a third-party review website when this wasn't the case.
-
DragonPlus Game Ltd t/a Happy Hospital
An in-app ad was socially irresponsible and caused unjustified distress and serious offence by trivialising miscarriage and stillbirth.
-
Wireless Group Media (GB) Ltd t/a Virgin Radio
A promotion on Virgin Radio's website wasn't administered fairly and caused unnecessary disappointment.
-
Beer52 Ltd
Two email promotions omitted significant conditions.
-
Heineken UK Ltd t/a Heineken
A paid-for online display ad for Heineken 0.0 didn’t include a prominent statement of ABV.
Rulings
Our rulings are published every Wednesday and set out on the public record how, following a formal investigation, the advertising rules apply and where we draw the line in judging whether an ad has broken the rules. We also publish a list of companies and organisations which agree to amend or withdraw their ad without being subject to a formal ruling.
Rulings (25)