Rulings (52)
  • This is Enough Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 20 May 2026

    A website, LinkedIn post and GoFundMe page promoting DNA testing kits for victims of sexual assault made misleading claims about the incidence of rapes and the potential for evidence gathered using their self-testing kit to be admissible in court. 

  • VAM Apps Co t/a The Coach

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 20 May 2026

     A paid-for YouTube ad for a men’s health app was likely to cause serious and widespread offence. 

  • Course Accreditation Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 13 May 2026

    A website and a paid-for Google search ad for an accreditation company didn’t provide suitable evidence to back up objective claims, including comparative claims. The ads also misleadingly implied their accreditation was recognised by insurers and that t...

  • Medilife Clinic Enfield

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 06 May 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for a health clinic made claims that their treatments could alleviate or treat the traits of autism without suitable evidence to support these claims. The ad also discouraged essential treatment for conditions for which medical supervision should be sought. 

  • The Professional Development Consortium Ltd t/a CPD Standards Office

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 06 May 2026

    Two paid-for Meta ads for a training accreditation company made misleading comparative claims with identifiable competitors which weren’t supported by evidence and couldn’t be verified by consumers.

  • Birling Shore Ltd t/a ShroomIQ

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)
    • 22 April 2026

    A website and paid-for Facebook ad for a children’s supplement brand stated that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure the symptoms of ADHD, Tourette Syndrome, anxiety and depression. The ads also made medicinal claims for unauthorised products, made unauthorised health claims&nb...

  • Dollead Technology Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 22 April 2026

    A paid-for search ad for a vacuum review website failed to make their commercial intent clear and falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their trade by presenting websites used for marketing purposes as independent review sites.

  • Easy as HGV Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 22 April 2026

    Three websites for Heavy Goods Vehicle (HGV) training service providers made misleading claims about HGV test pass rates and falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their business.

  • Ecoflow Innovation UK

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 22 April 2026

    A website for a sustainable energy company misleadingly claimed that their products could be installed without using a certified installer or electrician.

  • Global Health Tests Ltd t/a Check My Body Health

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 22 April 2026

    A website for a Bioresonance hair test misleadingly claimed that the test could comprehensively analyse body intolerances.

  • HGV Learning

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 22 April 2026

    A website for a Heavy Goods Vehicle (HGV) training service provider made misleading claims about HGV test pass rates.

  • HGVT Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 22 April 2026

    A website and pages for Heavy Goods Vehicle (HGV) training service providers made misleading claims about HGV test pass rates, the nature of a promotion and being the largest and best rated HGV training provider. The ad also falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their business.

  • L'Oréal (UK) Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Video on demand
    • 22 April 2026

    A Video-On-Demand ad for a serum made misleading claims that it was clinically proven to reduce hyperpigmentation in two weeks.

  • Shop TJC Ltd t/a Ideal World

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 22 April 2026

    Two teleshopping presentations advertising watches made misleading claims about price, savings and availability.

  • Sinointeractive Digital Marketing Co Ltd t/a trustedbuyerguide.org

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 22 April 2026

    A paid-for search ad for a vacuum review website failed to make their commercial intent clear and falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their trade by presenting websites used for marketing purposes as independent review sites.

  • Xinyu International Trading Ltd t/a consumertestreports.org

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 22 April 2026

    A paid-for search ad for a vacuum review website failed to make their commercial intent clear and falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their trade by presenting websites used for marketing purposes as independent review sites.

  • Centre of CPD Excellence

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 18 March 2026

    A website for an accreditation company made misleading claims it had panels of specialists, independent industry experts, accreditation against internationally recognised standards and official relationships with insurance partners.

  • Saeta Tech Ltd t/a PixVideo – AI Video Maker

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 March 2026

    A paid-for YouTube ad for an AI video maker which condoned digitally altering and exposing women’s bodies without their consent, was irresponsible, included a harmful gender stereotype and was likely to cause serious offence.

  • Practice Pal t/a Involve Education (Involve)

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 25 February 2026

    A website for a management information services software provider for schools made misleading and unverifiable comparative claims about competitors’ products.

  • WashWater UK Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Brochure
    • 25 February 2026

    A brochure for a water conditioning and purifying system manufacturer misleadingly implied their water treatment systems could target and remove existing limescale, reduce hot water bills and help improve certain skin conditions.