Rulings (42)
  • CLF Distribution Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 11 June 2025

    An email misleadingly claimed that products only contained “naturally sweet ingredients”.

  • Viva Research Ltd t/a Vivanmn

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 28 May 2025

    Two paid-for Facebook ads claimed that a food supplement could treat or cure ADHD, made medicinal claims for an unlicensed product and made unauthorised specific health claims. 

  • air up GmbH

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 28 May 2025

    A paid-for TikTok ad was irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offense.

  • EE Ltd t/a EE

    • Upheld in part
    • Internet (on own site)
    • 21 May 2025

    A website failed to directly qualify 'unlimited' claims. 

  • Vodafone Ltd t/a vodafone

    • Upheld
    • Internet (on own site)
    • 21 May 2025

    A website made misleading savings claims and implied that a promotional price was time-limited when this wasn't the case. 

  • ZOE Ltd t/a Zoe

    • Upheld
    • 21 May 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad misleadingly claimed that a supplement didn't contain any ultra-processed ingredients.

  • Dualit Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 30 April 2025

    A paid-for search ad misleadingly implied that coffee bags could be composted at home when this wasn't the case. 

  • Lavazza Coffee (UK) Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 30 April 2025

    A paid-for search ad misleadingly implied that coffee pods could be composted at home when this wasn't the case.

  • Octopus Energy Ltd

    • Upheld in part
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 23 April 2025

    Two paid-for social media ads, two website landing pages, a radio ad, a billboard and an email for Octopus Energy didn't include adequate substantiation.

  • Barclays Bank plc

    • Not upheld
    • Magazine (paid ad)
    • 09 April 2025

    A magazine ad was unlikely to give a misleading impression of Barclay’s overall contribution to carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions.

  • Shell UK Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 09 April 2025

    A TV ad didn’t give a misleading impression of Shell’s environmental impact.

  • TotalEnergies SE

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 09 April 2025

    A paid-for X ad for TotalEnergies omitted material information about the proportion of their overall business activities that comprised lower-carbon activities.

  • OceanSaver Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site), Television
    • 02 April 2025

    A website and TV ad made unsubstantiated environmental claims.

  • McDonald's Restaurants Ltd

    • Upheld in part
    • App (own claim), Television
    • 26 March 2025

    An ad for the ‘Feed the Family Offer’ shown in the My McDonald’s app failed to include all non-optional fees in quoted prices.

  • EDF Energy Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Radio
    • 19 February 2025

    A radio ad was misleading as it omitted information and didn’t make the basis of the claims made in the ad clear.

  • Supplylife Group Ltd t/a SUPPLYlife

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 19 February 2025

    A website misleadingly stated that, informed by their testing, an elimination diet could help food related energy dips, unwanted weight and IBS or its symptoms.

  • ScottishPower Energy Retail Ltd t/a Scottish Power

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 05 February 2025

    A TV ad featuring George Clarke wasn't quickly recognisable as an ad and led viewers to believe they were watching a programme. 

  • Lloyds Bank plc

    • Upheld in part
    • Poster, Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 December 2024

    A paid-for LinkedIn post for Lloyds Bank was misleading as it omitted significant information about the company’s environmental impact.

  • Vivostore Ltd t/a Vivo Life

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 18 December 2024

    Two TikTok ads stated that a food supplement could treat vitamin B12 deficiency or its symptoms, irresponsibly encouraged people to stop taking medically prescribed vitamin B12 injections and made unauthorised specific health claims.

  • Wizz Air Hungary Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (paid ad)
    • 27 November 2024

    A paid-for Google ad for Wizz Air gave a misleading impression of their flights’ environmental impact by not making the basis of comparative claims clear or providing verifying information.

Informally resolved (1)
  • Kentucky Fried Chicken (Great Britain) Ltd t/a KFC

    • 24 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Food, drink and supplements