-
ABD Supplies Ltd
Two emails and two product listings misleadingly and irresponsibly suggested that HID and LED conversion kits could be used by most vehicles on public roads.
-
Holiday Gems Ltd
A booking webpage for a holiday made misleading price claims.
-
Pressplay Ltd
A press ad for anti-glare driving glasses misleadingly implied they could prevent glare while driving and could make driving safer.
-
Rosenthal Capital Ltd t/a ULEZPROSPERITY
Two radio ads which implied that buying and letting cars had investment potential were broadcast on a non-specialist station.
-
Haven Leisure Ltd
A paid-for Facebook ad and website made misleading price claims.
-
Maki Online Services Ltd
An email misrepresented the consequences of not renewing an expired document and didn't make clear that an eVisa could be obtained for free via the Government’s website.
-
Secret Escapes Ltd
A website made misleading price comparisons and failed to make the basis of price comparisons clear.
-
Vacaciones eDreams, S.L. t/a eDreams
Two paid-for online display ads made unsubstantiated environmental claims.
-
Auto Finesse Ltd
An Instagram ad was socially irresponsible and caused serious offence by featuring a harmful stereotype by objectifying and sexualising women.
-
Eurostar International Ltd
A paid for Instagram post and a post on Eurostar’s Facebook page exaggerated the number of tickets available at a certain price and omitted material information about the dates tickets were available for.
-
Trav Expert Ltd t/a Travelcrew
Prices on a website for a retailer of flights and holidays were misleading because the advertiser did not hold evidence to show they were genuine and included all non-optional taxes, duties, fees and charges that applied to all or most buyers or that they were subject to change and that availability was limited.
-
Sunspot Tours Ltd t/a Mercury Holidays
A national press ad for a package holiday misleadingly described a holiday as including a "free" week.
-
Mazda Motors UK Ltd
A paid-for Meta ad for the Mazda2 Hybrid car gave a misleading impression of the vehicle’s environment impact and made absolute claims that couldn’t be evidenced.
-
Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd t/a Virgin Atlantic
A radio ad for Virgin Atlantic included the unqualified claim "100% sustainable aviation fuel", which gave a misleading impression of the fuel's environmental impact.
-
Hurtigruten UK Ltd t/a HX Hurtigruten Expeditions
A paid-for ad in a digital newspaper for a cruise made misleading and unsubstantiated claims about the environmental impact of the expedition and failed to make the basis of these environmental claims clear.
-
London Luton Airport Ltd t/a Luton Rising
A magazine ad and a poster for Luton Rising did not adequately qualify the claims made in the ad and omitted material information about the environmental impact of London Luton Airport’s expansion.
-
Jetline Travel Ltd t/a Jetline Travel
Media: Email
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring -
Direct Ferries Ltd t/a Direct Ferries
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring
-
We Love Holidays Ltd t/a LoveHolidays
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring
-
Air France-KLM t/a Air France
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring
-
Awaze Vacation Rentals Ltd t/a Hoseasons, Cottages.com
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring
-
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd t/a NCL
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring
-
RAC Motoring Services t/a RAC Motoring Services
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring
-
Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd t/a Virgin Atlantic
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring