Rulings (14)

  • Fitzdares Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 16 April 2025

    A post on ex-England cricketer, Stuart Broad’s X page promoting a bookmaker did not break our gambling rules as he was not likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

  • Stars Interactive Ltd t/a PokerStars

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 26 March 2025

    An Instagram ad portrayed gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible by trivialising gambling, encouraging repetitive participation and describing gambling as an investment.

  • PPB Entertainment Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Radio
    • 11 December 2024

    A radio ad for Betfair wasn’t inappropriately scheduled.

  • Dataverse Co. Limited t/a Gamehaus

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 25 September 2024

    Three paid-for TikTok ads for a social casino game app misleadingly implied that people could win real-world money or tangible prizes through gameplay when this wasn’t the case.

  • Huuuge Global Limited t/a Billionaire Casino

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 25 September 2024

    Two paid-for TikTok ads for a social casino game app misleadingly implied that people could win real-world money or tangible prizes through gameplay when this wasn’t the case.

  • Mobee Co Ltd t/a Ignite Classic Slots

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 25 September 2024

    Two paid-for TikTok ads for a social casino game app misleadingly implied that people could win real-world money or tangible prizes through gameplay when this wasn’t the case.

  • SpinX Games Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 25 September 2024

    Two paid-for TikTok ads for a social casino game app misleadingly implied that people could win real-world money or tangible prizes through gameplay when this wasn’t the case.

  • Zeroo Gravity Games LLC t/a Cash Tornado

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 25 September 2024

    Two paid-for TikTok ads for a social casino game app misleadingly implied that people could win real-world money or tangible prizes through gameplay when this wasn’t the case.

  • LC International Ltd t/a Coral

    • Not upheld
    • Digital outdoor
    • 31 July 2024

    A mobile digital billboard ad for Coral was not inappropriately placed.

  • WHG (International) Ltd t/a William Hill Online

    • Upheld
    • Internet (sponsored search)
    • 31 July 2024

    A paid-for search ad and a website for William Hill advertising a new customer welcome bonus misled consumers by failing to include all significant conditions of the promotion and by not positioning the conditions prominently.

  • GB Sports Advisors Ltd t/a Geoff Banks Online

    • Upheld
    • Internet (on own site)
    • 17 July 2024

    A website ad offering a free bet failed to include all the significant conditions of the promotion.

  • Festival Free Bets

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 15 May 2024

    A post on Astrid Wett’s X (formerly Twitter) page, advertising a company that collated betting offers, broke gambling ad rules by featuring someone under 25.

  • ProgressPlay Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 08 May 2024

    A website advertising a gambling promotion failed to disclose significant conditions of entry.

  • Postcode Lottery Ltd t/a People's Postcode Lottery

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 01 May 2024

    A TV ad for the Postcode Lottery featuring Emma Willis was not likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

Informally resolved (3)

  • X-Clusive Competitions Ltd

    • 17 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Media: Internet
    Topic: Gambling

  • AG Communications Ltd

    • 19 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Gambling

  • Spotlight Sports Group Ltd.

    • 05 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Gambling

Mail order cases (0)
Database cases (0)