Rulings (13)
  • Alibaba.com Singapore E-commerce Private Ltd t/a AliExpress

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid), Email
    • 17 September 2025

    An email and paid-for Google search ad for AliExpress made misleading price statements.

  • Lloyds Bank plc

    • Upheld
    • 20 August 2025

    A national press ad for Lloyds Banking Group, seen on 25 March 2025, included a photo of a black horse galloping past new homes with building work underway. Large text stated “£19.5 billion for social housing. And that’s just the start”. Smaller text underneath stated “Everyone deserves a safe place to call home. That’...

  • Amazon Europe Core Sarl t/a Amazon.co.uk

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 06 August 2025

    A webpage on Amazon.co.uk showed unclear options to purchase Amazon Prime and was misleading for consumers.

  • Octopus Energy Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 30 July 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad for heat pump installation made unsubstantiated price claims and failed to include material information about a government grant, including eligibility criteria.

  • Origin Sleep UK Ltd t/a Origin Mattress

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 30 July 2025

    A website for Origin Mattress made misleading claims about reference prices and associated savings.

  • Cambridge Corporate Consultants Ltd t/a The Claims Guide

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 16 April 2025

    An post on X by The Claims Guide misleadingly implied that their company was approved, endorsed or authorised by the UK Government.

  • Viagogo GmbH

    • Upheld
    • Audio (podcast)
    • 09 April 2025

    A podcast ad claimed that over half the events listed on Viagogo had tickets selling below face value when this wasn’t the case.

  • Gemporia Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 05 March 2025

    A teleshopping presentation misleadingly compared the price of a product to the price of a non-identical competitor product and failed to substantiate price statements.

  • Tesco Stores Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Digital outdoor
    • 12 February 2025

    An outdoor digital poster comparing the Tesco Clubcard and Sainsbury’s Nectar loyalty card schemes wasn’t misleading.

  • Webloyalty International Ltd t/a Webloyalty, Complete Savings

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 23 October 2024

    Two in-app ads and a pop-up banner ad for a shopper reward programme weren't clearly identifiable as ads and didn't make the presentation of choices clear.  

  • Webloyalty International Ltd t/a Webloyalty, Complete Savings

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 23 October 2024

    Three webpages on a website for a shopper reward programme failed to make clear the steps that people had to take to obtain a 'welcome reward'.    

  • Sky UK Ltd t/a NOW

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 25 September 2024

    A website for Now TV was misleading as it didn’t make it sufficiently clear that free trials, which were automatically added to the basket, would auto-renew at a fee unless cancelled.

  • Wenzhou Xinyu Maoyi Youxian Gongsi t/a XINYU TRADE

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 25 September 2024

    Two Instagram stories on Mel Lloyd’s account featuring affiliate links weren't obviously identifiable as ads.