Rulings (20)
  • Beautyjenics Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 16 April 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad for Beautyjenics, a cosmetic treatment provider, irresponsibly pressured consumers into booking, and trivialised the risks of, “liquid BBLs” (Brazilian Butt Lift) and exploited women’s insecurities surrounding body image.

  • Bomb Doll Aesthetics

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 16 April 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad for Bomb Doll Aesthetics, a Black Friday promotion, irresponsibly pressured consumers into booking, and trivialised the risks of, “liquid BBLs” (Brazilian Butt Lift).

  • CCskinlondondubai

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 16 April 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad for CCskinlondondubai, a cosmetic treatment provider, irresponsibly pressured consumers into booking, and trivialised the risks of, “liquid BBLs” (Brazilian Butt Lift) and exploited women’s insecurities surrounding body image.

  • EME Aesthetics & Beauty Academy Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 16 April 2025

    An Instagram ad for EME Aesthetics, a Black Friday promotion, irresponsibly pressured consumers into booking, and trivialised the risks of, “liquid BBLs” (Brazilian Butt Lift).

  • NKD Medical Ltd t/a Dr Ducu London

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 16 April 2025

    A paid-for Instagram ad for Dr. Ducu, a cosmetic treatment provider, irresponsibly pressured consumers into booking, and trivialised the risks of, “liquid BBLs” (Brazilian Butt Lift).

  • Rejuvenate Academy Ltd t/a Rejuvenate Clinics

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 16 April 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad for Rejuvenate Clinics, a cosmetic treatment provider, irresponsibly pressured consumers into booking, and trivialised the risks of, “liquid BBLs” (Brazilian Butt Lift).

  • Foreo AB t/a Foreo

    • Upheld in part
    • Internet
    • 09 April 2025

    A product listing on Amazon made unsubstantiated claims that an IPL device could reduce or remove hair permanently and that treatments was ‘pain-free’.

  • The Essence Vault Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 15 January 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad made misleading pricing claims.   

  • Valterous Ltd t/a Therapie Clinic

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 December 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad indirectly advertised a prescription only medicine to the public.

  • Jaded London Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 11 December 2024

    An Instagram post was socially irresponsible and caused serious offense by featuring a harmful stereotype by objectifying and sexualising women.

  • Pall Mall Medical (Manchester) Ltd t/a Pall Mall Cosmetics

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 09 October 2024

    An Instagram ad was irresponsible as it trivialised the decision to undergo cosmetic surgery and linked cosmetic surgery with happiness and confidence.

  • PlymGlow Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Circular
    • 09 October 2024

    A circular for a tanning salon discouraged essential treatment for conditions for which medical supervision should be sought and irresponsibly claimed that health benefits could be obtained from sunbeds.

  • Guang Zhou Shi Chen Ming Ke Ji You Xian Gong Si t/a MENGCOOL

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 25 September 2024

    Two Instagram stories on Jess Sheppard’s account featuring affiliate links weren't obviously identifiable as ads.

  • THG Beauty Ltd t/a Look Fantastic

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 25 September 2024

    An Instagram story highlight on Erim Kaur’s account wasn’t obviously identifiable as an ad.

  • Nasty Gal Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 11 September 2024

    A promotion on the Nasty Gal Instagram page failed to clearly publish the winner of a competition.

  • Valterous Ltd t/a Therapie Clinic

    • Upheld
    • Internet
    • 21 August 2024

    A website and Instagram ad made misleading and unsubstantiated saving claims.   

  • MYA Clinics Ltd t/a MYA Cosmetic Surgery

    • Upheld
    • Website (paid ad)
    • 31 July 2024

    Two display ads for cosmetic surgery shown on the Quizlet website were inappropriately targeted.

  • Wild Cosmetics Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet
    • 24 July 2024

    A pre-roll YouTube ad for Wild deodorant misleadingly implied that there was a link between competing deodorant products and breast cancer.

  • Lyma Life Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 26 June 2024

    A paid-for Instagram ad for an at home beauty device misleadingly claimed that it was the ‘world’s most powerful home beauty device’ and that it was a hundred times more effective and powerful than competitors’ devices.

  • Fussy Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 19 June 2024

    Fussy Ltd: A LinkedIn and Instagram ad for Fussy deodorant discredited and denigrated a competitor's brand and products.  

Informally resolved (4)
  • L'Oréal (UK) Ltd

    • 17 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Beauty products, grooming and hygiene

  • British Hair Clinic (unconfirmed)

    • 19 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Cosmetic surgery and procedures

  • Cosmetic Medical Advice UK Ltd.

    • 05 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Beauty products, grooming and hygiene

  • L'Oréal (UK) Ltd

    • 05 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Beauty products, grooming and hygiene