-
Mayborn (UK) Ltd t/a Tommee Tippee
A paid-for Instagram ad for a device for removing air particles from milk made unsubstantiated efficacy claims for treating colic and its symptoms.
-
The Edinburgh Herbal Dispensary Ltd t/a Napiers Edinburgh
Five TikTok ads made medicinal claims for an unlicenced product.
-
Person(s) unknown t/a Cishx GB
A paid-for Meta ad which claimed that underwear could treat prostate issues made medical claims for a device that didn’t hold the applicable conformity marking and was not registered with the MHRA.
-
Person(s) unknown t/a Cheerchest Cove
A paid-for Meta ad for prostate cream made medicinal claims for an unlicensed product.
-
Ejec Ventures LLC t/a Auri Nutrition
A paid-for Facebook ad made claims that a supplement could eliminate stress and also made unauthorised specific health claims and general health claims.
-
Nowt Ventures Ltd t/a Feel Güd
Four paid-for Facebook ads made claims that a supplement could treat anxiety and also made unauthorised specific health claims and general health claims.
-
Nutriburst Ltd t/a Nutriburst Vitamins
A paid-for Facebook ad made claims that a supplement could treat anxiety and also made unauthorised specific health claims and general health claims.
-
Person(s) unknown t/a Vitality Greens
Two paid-for Facebook ads made claims that a supplement could treat anxiety, made unauthorised specific and general health claims, and advertised a products containing unauthorised novel foods.
-
Well Gummies
Two Facebook ads and a TikTok ad made claims that a supplement could treat multiple conditions including anxiety, made unauthorised specific and general health claims, and advertised a products containing unauthorised novel foods.
-
Tecnología Sostenible y Responsable SL (TSR) t/a Sustainable and Responsible Technology SL
A paid-for X ad made misleading claims about the effect of blue light on eyes.
-
Lark Holdings Limited
A website misleadingly claimed that a programme could permanently eliminate an array of mental health disorders and discouraged essential treatment for conditions for which medical supervision should be sought.
-
GKOnlineCo Pty Ltd t/a Pups Den, Official Aida Store
A paid-for social media ad made medicinal claims about an unlicenced product.
-
Hismile Pty Ltd
Two paid-for TikTok and Instagram ads misleadingly implied that a colour correcting product was effective for whitening teeth immediately.
-
infirst Ltd t/a Flarin
A TV ad misleadingly implied that Flarin was better for treating joint pain than other ibuprofen products.
-
Vytaliving Ltd
A press ad for nutritional tablets claimed a food could treat, prevent or cure human disease, featured claims that were not authorised on the GB NHC Register, and made misleading claims around savings.
-
OneCompress
Two paid-for Facebook ads for bamboo gloves and socks made medical claims for unlicensed products.
-
Vir Health Ltd t/a Numan
A TV ad for a hair loss treatment guaranteed the efficacy of the product, breaking the Code.
-
Lynne McTaggart
Two marketing emails and a website made misleading claims about alternative medicine treating medical conditions, and discouraged people seeking essential treatment for conditions for which medical supervision should be sought.
-
Medi Supplies Ltd
A website made two pricing claims that were misleading and could not be substantiated.
-
GMG Pharmacy Ltd t/a The IV Clinic
The website for The IV Clinic, www.iv.ghoshmedicalgroup.com, seen 1 April 2019, featured a section on its homepage titled “IV DRIPS MENU” which listed the intravenous (IV) drips services it offered: “ANTI-AGEING Hair, Nail & Skin Support”; “GLUTA GLOW Brighter, Clearer Skin”; &ld...
-
Rakhee Mediratta
Topic: Medicines, remedies and therapies