Rulings (35)
  • Hemios

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Internet (display)
    • 09 September 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad and a paid-for YouTube display ad for a magnetic bracelet made misleading claims in relation to weight-loss and improving erectile performance.

  • SheMed Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 02 September 2026

    A paid-for Reddit ad for a female-focused medical weight-loss service promoted weight-loss prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules, was likely to exploit consumers’ insecurities relating to body image and weight and was irresponsible.

  • The Monty Bojangles Co Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 02 September 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for Monty Bojangles didn’t break the less healthy food rules because it was a small and medium-sized enterprise and was therefore exempt.   

  • Airbrush

    • Upheld
    • 29 July 2026

    Two paid-for Facebook ads and a website for a hairstyling company misleadingly implied they were endorsed by fashion brands, used unrelated influencer content to promote their product and didn’t have evidence to show that testimonials were genuine.

  • Bolt Healthcare Ltd t/a Bolt Pharmacy

    • Upheld
    • 29 July 2026

    Two paid-for Facebook ads for an online pharmacy failed to make their commercial intent clear and falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their trade by presenting websites used for advertising purposes as independent review sites. They also promoted weight loss prescription-only ...

  • Bolt Healthcare Ltd t/a Bolt Pharmacy

    • Upheld
    • 29 July 2026

    Two paid-for Facebook ads for an online pharmacy promoted weight loss prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.

  • Kind Patches Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 15 July 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a supplement company made claims that a supplement patch could help with weight-loss and made medicinal claims for products that weren’t authorised by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The ad was also socially irresponsible and incl...

  • Phlo Technologies Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 15 July 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad promoted weight-loss prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules. 

  • Express Healthcare Ltd t/a pharmacyonline.co.uk

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 24 June 2026

    A paid-for Meta ad and website for an online pharmacy promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules. 

  • Beauty Pie Ltd t/a Beauty Pie Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Poster
    • 10 June 2026

    A poster for an LED face mask made misleading claims that it was clinically proven to reduce wrinkles in 4 weeks.

  • Menwell Ltd t/a Voy

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 27 May 2026

    Three emails for an online pharmacy promoted prescription-only medicines to the public against the law and our rules. The ads were also socially irresponsible by creating an undue sense of urgency for people who were considering medicated weight-loss programmes. 

  • 111 Skin Ltd t/a 111skin

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 13 May 2026

    A product listing for a skincare product misleadingly exaggerated the effects of a cosmetic product for ageing skin.

  • Beiersdorf UK Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Poster
    • 29 April 2026

    A poster ad for Eucerin Skincare misleadingly claimed that a serum was clinically proven to make you look up to 5 years younger.

  • Global Health Tests Ltd t/a Check My Body Health

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 22 April 2026

    A website for a Bioresonance hair test misleadingly claimed that the test could comprehensively analyse body intolerances.

  • L'OrĂ©al (UK) Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Video on demand
    • 22 April 2026

    A Video-On-Demand ad for a serum made misleading claims that it was clinically proven to reduce hyperpigmentation in two weeks.

  • TFS Buying Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 March 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a buy now pay later arrangement irresponsibly encouraged non-essential spending through the use of credit, particularly in relation to funding non-essential Christmas purchases.

  • Health Bridge Ltd t/a Zava

    • Upheld
    • Website (ad feature)
    • 18 February 2026

    An advertorial promoting medicated weight-loss seen on the Mumsnet website didn’t make it clear it was an ad, used healthcare professionals to endorse a medicine and promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.

  • Health Bridge Ltd t/a Zava

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 11 February 2026

    An Instagram post, TikTok video and a Facebook post for weight-loss injections promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.

  • MedExpress Enterprises Ltd t/a MedExpress

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 11 February 2026

    Three Instagram posts and a TikTok video for weight-loss injections promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.

  • Menwell Ltd t/a Voy

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 11 February 2026

    Four Instagram ads for weight-loss injections promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.