-
Skincodes Aesthetics
We banned ads for marketing prescription-only medicine to the public.
-
Tesco Mobile Ltd t/a Tesco Mobile
We banned ads for replacing expletives with food terms.
-
Festival Free Bets
A post on Astrid Wett’s X (formerly Twitter) page, advertising a company that collated betting offers, broke gambling ad rules by featuring someone under 25.
-
LC International Ltd t/a Ladbrokes
A TV and Video on Demand ad featured content that was reflective of youth culture and was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.
-
Lead Pronto Ltd t/a LeadPronto
Four paid-for Meta ads offering a home efficiency scheme grant misleadingly implied that the company was endorsed by or associated with the UK Government, falsely implied that they themselves were offering grants for a free boiler, and didn’t make the nature of their business clear.
-
UK Electronic Cigarette Ltd t/a UKVAPINGSTORE
A paid for Google ad promoted unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes through a sponsored link.
-
Addiction Recovery Systems Ltd t/a Rehab Guide
A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business and that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated and also failed to make clear that they received a commission for their service.
-
The Pure Gold Group Ltd t/a The Pure Gold Company
Two paid-for Google ads failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.
-
Borthwick Group (Energy) Ltd
A paid-for Facebook ad from a credit broker misleadingly suggested that it had been endorsed or approved by the BBC.
-
Woodbury House Ltd
Two paid-for Google search ads for an art investment company failed to make clear that art investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.
-
GB Sports Advisors Ltd t/a Geoff Banks Online
A website ad offering a free bet failed to include all the significant conditions of the promotion.
-
Easy Consulting SL t/a Sky Breaks
A prize promotion on a travel agency’s website misleadingly omitted significant conditions.
-
888 UK Ltd
A website advertorial for a slot machine app was banned for misleadingly implying that offers were time-limited and for making other misleading claims.
-
Kabam Games Inc
An app store listing for the ‘Marvel Contest of Champions’ game failed to make clear that it contained loot boxes.
-
Nexters Global Ltd
An app store listing for the ‘Hero Wars: Alliance RPG’ game failed to make clear that it contained loot boxes.
-
On The Beach Ltd
A TV ad and two website pages for On the Beach misleadingly implied that all consumers with eligible bookings would receive free airport lounge access.
-
Hurtigruten UK Ltd t/a HX Hurtigruten Expeditions
A paid-for ad in a digital newspaper for a cruise made misleading and unsubstantiated claims about the environmental impact of the expedition and failed to make the basis of these environmental claims clear.
-
May Health Tourism Services t/a MAYCLINIK
A paid-for Google search ad made misleading and irresponsible claims about safety, and made references that trivialised the decision to undergo cosmetic surgery.
-
One Source Digital Ltd
A paid-for Facebook ad for an ECO funding and government grant scheme misleadingly implied that the company was endorsed by or affiliated with the UK Government.
-
Red Miracle Group t/a Domino’s Pizza
A promotion offered in a leaflet for Domino’s Pizza was not administered fairly and was likely to have caused participants unnecessary disappointment.
-
Free Lucky Lottery
-
Digital Adventures Ltd t/a Free Bingo Genie, Strike Wild
-
Colibri SAS
-
SimplyCook Ltd
-
AG1 UK Enterprise Ltd
-
Amazon Europe Core Sarl t/a Amazon.co.uk
-
Parkdean Resorts UK Ltd
-
Grocery Delivery E-Services UK Ltd
-
Moy Park Ltd
-
Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd
-
Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd
-
Boots UK Ltd
-
Vision Express (UK) Ltd
-
First Class Learning Ltd
-
DSG Retail Ltd
-
Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd t/a Estée Lauder UK, La Mer UK
-
Clarson Ltd t/a Raffleade
-
Sky UK Ltd
-
Apple (UK) Ltd
-
Beliani GmbH