-
Ella Kate Reeves
Two Facebook pages for Ella Reeves misleadingly claimed she was accredited to the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy.
-
Emma Louise Taylor t/a Harley St Therapy
A website ad for a person claiming to be a member of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy was banned for being misleading.
-
Titan Insulation Ltd
Claims on a home insulation service website were misleading.
-
The Snooty Fox
ad breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rule 3.50 (Endorsements and testimonials). The ad must not appear
-
West Yorkshire Windows Ltd
(Substantiation) and 3.45 (Endorsements and testimonials), but did not find it in breach. No further action necessary
-
Borthwick Group (Energy) Ltd
A paid-for Facebook ad from a credit broker misleadingly suggested that it had been endorsed or approved by the BBC.
-
UK Bi-Fold Door Factory Ltd
A website for a window and door fitting company misleadingly claimed to have an official partnership with Schüco and Cortizo.
-
Hanson Roofing and Building Ltd
A press ad for a roofing and building service broke the rules for misleadingly claiming they were a member of a construction certification body.
-
TMS Legal Ltd
Two paid-for TikTok posts were misleading, as they implied testimonials featured were from genuine customers of Vanquis Bank and Moneybarn No.1.
-
One Source Digital Ltd
A paid-for Facebook ad for an ECO funding and government grant scheme misleadingly implied that the company was endorsed by or affiliated with the UK Government.
-
Oneade
We banned an ad for using filters to exaggerate a beauty product’s efficacy.
-
Diamond Mist Ltd
CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1 (Misleading advertising), 3.45 and 3.48 (Endorsements and testimonials). The
-
Swann Communications (Europe) Ltd t/a Swann
Reviews on a website for a surveillance product company were genuine and unlikely to mislead.
-
Cyrano Ltd
A Facebook post for a sunbed retailer misled by inaccurately representing the opinions of the person quoted.
-
The Lead Guys Ltd t/a Discount Double Glazing, New Windows Scotland
A website ad for double glazing was banned for including false testimonials and for misleadingly claiming to be an independent comparison website.
-
Stockmarket Insider Ltd
(Edition 12) rules 3.1 (Misleading advertising) and 3.45 (Endorsements and testimonials). The
-
The Perfect Cosmetics Company Ltd
the ad under CAP Code (Edition 12) rule3.45 (Endorsements and testimonials), but did not find it … (Endorsements and testimonials).3. UpheldWe considered that consumers would understand the claim “HALF PRICE
-
Weybury Hildreth Ltd t/a Purflo
A website ad misleadingly claimed that a baby bed was certified for safe sleeping, and claimed that the product met specific British Safety Standards which were not fully applicable for the product.
-
Bounce Back Drinks Ltd
An advertorial for a health drink broke the rules for falsely implying endorsements and making unauthorised health claims.
-
UK Deed Poll Service Ltd
Website ads for a deed poll company misled consumers by implying it was the officially recognised organisation for such services.
-
World of Fashion (Manchester) Ltd