-
Ella Kate Reeves
Two Facebook pages for Ella Reeves misleadingly claimed she was accredited to the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy.
-
Emma Louise Taylor t/a Harley St Therapy
A website ad for a person claiming to be a member of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy was banned for being misleading.
-
Titan Insulation Ltd
Claims on a home insulation service website were misleading.
-
The Snooty Fox
ad breached CAP Code (Edition 12) rule 3.50 (Endorsements and testimonials). The ad must not appear
-
West Yorkshire Windows Ltd
(Substantiation) and 3.45 (Endorsements and testimonials), but did not find it in breach. No further action necessary
-
Borthwick Group (Energy) Ltd
A paid-for Facebook ad from a credit broker misleadingly suggested that it had been endorsed or approved by the BBC.
-
UK Bi-Fold Door Factory Ltd
A website for a window and door fitting company misleadingly claimed to have an official partnership with Schüco and Cortizo.
-
Hanson Roofing and Building Ltd
A press ad for a roofing and building service broke the rules for misleadingly claiming they were a member of a construction certification body.
-
TMS Legal Ltd
Two paid-for TikTok posts were misleading, as they implied testimonials featured were from genuine customers of Vanquis Bank and Moneybarn No.1.
-
One Source Digital Ltd
A paid-for Facebook ad for an ECO funding and government grant scheme misleadingly implied that the company was endorsed by or affiliated with the UK Government.
-
Oneade
We banned an ad for using filters to exaggerate a beauty product’s efficacy.
-
Diamond Mist Ltd
CAP Code (Edition 12) rules 3.1 (Misleading advertising), 3.45 and 3.48 (Endorsements and testimonials). The
-
Swann Communications (Europe) Ltd t/a Swann
Reviews on a website for a surveillance product company were genuine and unlikely to mislead.
-
Cyrano Ltd
A Facebook post for a sunbed retailer misled by inaccurately representing the opinions of the person quoted.
-
The Lead Guys Ltd t/a Discount Double Glazing, New Windows Scotland
A website ad for double glazing was banned for including false testimonials and for misleadingly claiming to be an independent comparison website.
-
Stockmarket Insider Ltd
(Edition 12) rules 3.1 (Misleading advertising) and 3.45 (Endorsements and testimonials). The
-
The Perfect Cosmetics Company Ltd
the ad under CAP Code (Edition 12) rule3.45 (Endorsements and testimonials), but did not find it (Endorsements and testimonials).3. UpheldWe considered that consumers would understand the claim “HALF PRICE
-
Weybury Hildreth Ltd t/a Purflo
A website ad misleadingly claimed that a baby bed was certified for safe sleeping, and claimed that the product met specific British Safety Standards which were not fully applicable for the product.
-
Bounce Back Drinks Ltd
An advertorial for a health drink broke the rules for falsely implying endorsements and making unauthorised health claims.
-
UK Deed Poll Service Ltd
Website ads for a deed poll company misled consumers by implying it was the officially recognised organisation for such services.
-
World of Fashion (Manchester) Ltd