-
Air France-KLM
A paid-for Google ad gave a misleading impression of the airline’s environmental impact.
-
Etihad Airways
A paid-for Google ad gave a misleading impression of the airline’s environmental impact.
-
Severn Trent Water Ltd
A TV ad for a water company did not mislead or omit significant information.
-
Deutsche Lufthansa AG t/a Lufthansa
A poster for Lufthansa made misleading claims about the airline’s environmental impact.
-
4AIR LLC
A paid-for Google ad, for 4AIR LLC misleadingly understated the environmental impact of their service.
-
Anglian Water Services Ltd t/a Anglian Water
A TV ad and video on demand (VOD) ad for a water company misleadingly omitted material information about its history of releasing sewage into the environment.
-
Ancol Pet Products Ltd
A website made misleading environmental claims about dog waste bags.
-
Deutsche Lufthansa AG t/a Lufthansa
A paid-for Google ad gave a misleading impression of the airline’s environmental impact.
-
Golden Leaves Ltd
An ad on the company’s website misleadingly implied that their MDF coffins were more eco-friendly than other options, without sufficient evidence.
-
Friends of the Earth Ltd
incompatible with tackling climate change”; and 2. “Fracking risks contaminating groundwater … incompatible with tackling climate change. They said hydraulic fracturing (fracking) was the process … up to the Paris Agreement, agreed at the UN Climate Change Conference in 2015, which aimed to keep
-
JC Atkinson & Son Ltd
An ad on the company’s website misleadingly implied that their MDF coffins were more eco-friendly than other options, without sufficient evidence.
-
Toyota (GB) plc
A paid-for Facebook post and a poster ad condoned using vehicles in a way that disregarded their impact on nature and the environment, and as such were socially irresponsible.
-
Roxane UK Ltd t/a Aqua Pura
A TV ad for a drinks product was banned for misleadingly claiming that the bottle was made from 100% recycled components and for claiming the product was “nature friendly” when this was not the case.
-
Jaguar Land Rover Ltd
A newspaper ad for Jaguar Land Rover was not found to be socially irresponsible.
-
Intrepid Travel Group UK Ltd
A poster for a travel company misleadingly minimised the impact of their holidays on the environment.
-
HSBC UK Bank plc
HSBC UK Bank plc - Two posters for a bank that promoted its green initiatives omitted significant information about its contribution to carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions and were therefore misleading.
-
Oatly UK Ltd t/a Oatly
Two TV ads, a paid-for Facebook post, a paid-for Twitter post and two newspaper ads for an oat drink company were banned for making misleading environmental claims.
-
Alpro (UK) Ltd t/a Alpro
A poster for an almond drink was banned for making misleading environmental claims, in particular, that the product was ‘good for the planet’.
-
Smart Metering Communications Body Ltd t/a Smart Energy GB
A multimedia ad campaign by Smart Energy GB, including TV, Facebook, radio and press ads, did not fall foul of the ad rules as the ads were all deemed unlikely to mislead people.
-
Easigrass (Distribution) Ltd
A Facebook post and website for artificial grass made misleading claims about recyclability, and misleadingly implied the product was eco friendly.
-
Elsan Ltd
-
Carbon Neutral Britain Ltd
-
Essity UK Ltd
-
Positec Germany GmbH
-
Travis Perkins plc
-
Carbon Neutral Britain Ltd
-
POD Point Ltd
-
EcoVibe Online Ltd
-
Brand Developers Ltd
-
British Airways plc
-
TUI UK Ltd
-
Native Snacks Ltd
-
Bodywise (UK) Ltd
-
Nuby UK LLP
-
Notting Hill & Ealing High School
-
GoPro Inc
-
Kimberly-Clark Ltd
-
Prestige Gifting Ltd
-
easyJet Airline Co Ltd
-
Toyota (GB) plc