-
Chuckling Goat Ltd
A poster ad and website claims by a food provider broke the rules by implying its products prevented, treated or cured human disease.
-
PCK SKIN (Manchester) Ltd t/a SkinSpaceUK
A promotional email, by an aesthetic clinic, offering vitamin injections broke the rules by promoting prescription-only medicines to the general public.
-
The Regenerative Clinic Ltd
A newspaper ad for joint pain treatment was banned for implying that the treatment permanently relieved discomfort associated with arthritis.
-
Procter & Gamble (Health & Beauty Care) Ltd
A poster advertising nasal spray made misleading claims about its effectiveness against eliminating cold symptoms.
-
Not Guilty Food Co Ltd t/a The Skinny Food Co
A paid social media ad and a website for Skinny Sauce products made nutrition claims that implied they were calorie-free or energy free when they did not meet the conditions of use for the claims.
-
Revival Drinks Ltd t/a Revival Shots
A Facebook ad and two Instagram ads for Revival Shots broke the ad rules by implying that their food product could prevent, treat or cure human disease and for making health claims that were not listed as authorised on the EU Register of nutrition and health claims.
-
Mizkan Euro Ltd t/a Branston
A poster ad for vinegar did not condone or encourage poor nutritional habits or an unhealthy lifestyle in children.
-
Iceland Foods Ltd t/a Iceland
A national press ad for a supermarket did not make a misleading price comparison.
-
Cosmetic Medical Advice UK Ltd t/a Dr Rita Rakus Clinic
Instagram posts that implied an IV drip treatment could help to prevent people from catching coronavirus/COVID-19 broke the advertising rules.
-
REVIV UK Ltd
Claims on a website that an IV drip treatment could prevent or treat coronavirus/COVID-19 broke the advertising rules.
-
The Private Harley Street Clinic
Claims on a website that an IV drip treatment could prevent or treat coronavirus/COVID-19 broke the advertising rules.
-
BKUK Group Ltd t/a Burger King
Ads in social media for a plant-based burger misleadingly implied that the product was suitable for vegans and vegetarians.
-
MW Nutrition Ltd t/a Motion Nutrition
A website ad for nutrition capsules was banned for claiming they could prevent degenerative diseases.
-
Easylife Group Ltd t/a Easylife Group, Positive Health
A brochure ad was banned for making medicinal claims for unlicensed products.
-
infirst Healthcare Ltd t/a Flarin
A TV ad for ibuprofen products misleadingly implied that it was superior to other products for treating the joint pain.
-
Bounce Back Drinks Ltd
An advertorial for a health drink broke the rules for falsely implying endorsements and making unauthorised health claims.
-
Marks and Spencer plc
A TV ad was recognisable as an ad and did not break the rules.
-
Nestlé UK Ltd
A competition promoted on coffee packaging broke the rules by not presenting significant conditions clearly enough.
-
BrewDog Plc
A slogan on an outdoor poster for a brewing company broke the rules around social responsibility and offence.
-
Cells4Life Group LLP
Claims on a cord blood stem cell bank website that made comparisons with identifiable competitors were misleading.
-
Dockyard Social CIC
Media: Internet (social networking), Leaflet
Topic: Food, drink and supplements